UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

 

Filed by the Registrant  ý

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o

 

Check the appropriate box:

o

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

Definitive Additional Materials

o

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

Meritage Homes Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

No fee required.

o

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

 

(3)

Filing Party:

 

 

 

 

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.

 



 

April 10, 2006

Dear Stockholder:

We have enclosed our Proxy Statement and Annual Report. The Annual Report provides a review of our record results for the past year as well as our current outlook for the upcoming year.

This year, we have several important matters to address at our Annual Meeting. The proposals to be voted upon at this year’s Annual Meeting include the election of our nominees for director, and a proposal to approve an increase in our authorized capital stock so that we can maintain the flexibility to raise new capital to pursue our growth strategies, as well as proposals to approve both stock and cash based incentive plans for our management and employees.

In terms of the incentive plans we are recommending for approval, we note that, consistent with practices currently supported by shareholder advocate groups, the large majority of the compensation paid to our senior managers over the last several years has been tied directly to our company’s financial performance. And we are proud to report that our performance has been excellent. For example, from 2000 to 2005 our revenues have increased to $3 billion, a 45% compounded annual growth rate and our net earnings have increased at a rate of 48% over the same period. These results were a primary driver of the increase in our stock price from $9.31 to $62.92 per share (on a split adjusted basis) over the same period, a 576% increase in value.

Finally, we note that under current tax laws, the deductibility by the company of the compensation of our senior executives is subject to a number of conditions, including stockholder approval of our bonus and stock programs. Accordingly, it is critical that we obtain your approval of these plans, not only to ensure that our Board of Directors has the tools necessary to motivate and compensate our senior management, but also so that our company can deduct fully the amounts we pay to them,  thereby maximizing earnings and, in turn, providing the greatest benefit to our  stockholders.

We look forward to your participation at the Annual Meeting either in person or by proxy.

Very truly yours,

Board of Directors

Enclosures



 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 


Date:  Wednesday, May 11, 2005
17, 2006

Time:  9:10:00 a.m. Arizona TimeCentral time

 

Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
7575 East Princess Drive
Scottsdale, Arizona  85255Hotel Crescent Court

400 Crescent Court

Dallas, Texas  75201

 

To Our Stockholders:

 

You are invited to attend the Meritage Homes Corporation 20052006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.  The purposes ofStockholders for the meeting are to:following purposes:

 

1.                                       Elect fiveTo elect four Class III Directors, each to hold office until our 20072008 annual meeting and one Class I Director, to hold office until our 2006 Annual Meeting,his successor is duly elected and qualified.

 

2.                                       RatifyTo approve an amendment to our charter to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 50,000,000 to 125,000,000,

3.To approve the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan,

4.                                       To approve the 2006 Annual Incentive Plan,

5.To ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 20052006 fiscal year, and

 

3.6.                                       TransactTo conduct any other business that may properly come before the meeting.meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

 

These items are more fully described in the following pages.

accompanying Proxy Statement. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 20052006 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. A copy of our 20042005 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes audited financial statements, is enclosed.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

C. Timothy White, Secretary

By Order of the Board of Directors

LARRY W. SEAY, SECRETARY

 

Scottsdale, Arizona

April 11, 2005

10, 2006

 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING, PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURNING IT IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. YOU MAY ALSO AUTHORIZE A PROXY TO VOTE YOUR SHARES BY USING THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE AS DESCRIBED ON THE PROXY CARD.

 



 

MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION
8501 E. PRINCESS DRIVE

17851 NORTH 85TH STREET

SUITE 290
300

SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85255


www.meritagehomes.com

PROXY STATEMENT


 

This Proxy Statement is furnished to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Meritage Homes Corporation to be used in voting at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 11, 2005.17, 2006. The meeting will be held at 9:10:00 a.m. Central time at Scottsdale Fairmont Princess, 7575 East Princess Drive, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255.Hotel Crescent Court, 400 Crescent Court, Dallas, Texas  75201. The proxy materials relating to the annual meeting, together with our annual report (which includes audited consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2004)2005), were mailed on or about April 11, 200514, 2006 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 20052006 (the “record date”).

 

You are entitled to revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by attending the annual meeting and voting in person, duly executing and delivering a proxy bearing a later date, or sending written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at the above address. Whether or not you plan to be present at the annual meeting, we encourage you to sign and return the enclosed proxy card or to use telephone or Internet voting. Refer to your proxy card for instructions about voting by telephone, Internet and mail.

 

The Meritage Board of Directors is soliciting proxies. We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including charges and expenses of brokerage firms and others for forwarding solicitation material to beneficial owners of our outstanding common stock. We may solicit proxies through the mail, by personal interview or telephone.telephone, including through the use of a third party proxy solicitor. If we use a proxy solicitor, we estimate the cost will be approximately $9,500.

 

The following information should be reviewed along with the audited consolidated financial statements, notes to consolidated financial statements, reportreports of independent registered public accounting firmfirms and other information included in our 20042005 Annual Report that was mailed to you along with this Proxy Statement.

 

VOTING SECURITIES OUTSTANDING

 

On the record date, there were 27,010,02826,624,510 shares of Meritage common stock outstanding. The common stock is our only outstanding class of voting securities. Each share is entitled to one vote on each proposal to be voted on at the annual meeting. Only holders of record of common stock at the close of business on the record date will be permitted to vote at the meeting, either in person or by valid proxy.

VOTING PROXIES

Shares of common stock represented by properly executed proxy cards received by the Company in time for the meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions specified in the proxies. Unless contrary instructions are indicated on a proxy, the shares of common stock represented by such proxy will be voted in the manner directed by a stockholder.  If no direction is made, proxies will be voted (i) for the nominees for election of directors set forth in Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors, (ii) for the re-appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2005 fiscal year, and (iii) at the discretion of the proxy holders, on all other matters properly brought before the meeting.

VOTE NECESSARY FOR ACTION

Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.  This means that the nominees that receive the largest number of FOR votes cast will be electedthe election as Directors.  Most other actions require an affirmative votedirectors of the majoritynominees named in this Proxy Statement, FOR the amendment to our charter increasing the number of authorized shares present at the meeting.  If you mark “withhold authority” on your proxy with respect to the election of a nominee, your vote will not count either “for” or “against” the nominee.  Brokers who hold shares in street name for customers who are beneficial owners of such shares are prohibited from giving a proxy to vote such customers’ shares on “non-routine” matters in the absence of specific instructions from such customers.  This is commonly referred to as a “broker non-vote.”  Abstentions and broker non-votes have the effect of a “no” vote on matters other than director elections.common stock,

 



 

FOR the 2006 Stock Option Plan, FOR the 2006 Annual Incentive Plan and FOR the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) determine whether proposals presented at shareowner meetings are “routine” or “non-routine.”  If a proposal is routine, a broker or other entity holding shares for an owner in street name may vote on the proposal without voting instructions from the owner. If a proposal is non-routine, the broker or other entity may vote on the proposal only if the owner has provided voting instructions. A “broker non-vote” occurs when the broker or other entity is unable to vote on a proposal because the proposal is non-routine and the owner does not provide instructions. All of the proposals other than Proposal No. 3 (the proposal to approve the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan) are routine proposals under the rules of the NYSE. As a result, brokers or other entities holding shares for an owner in street name may vote on the proposals even if no voting instructions are provided by the owner.

The management and Board of Directors of the Company know of no other matters to be brought before the meeting. If other matters are properly presented to the stockholders for action at the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof, it is the intention of the proxy holders named in the proxy to vote in their discretion on all matters on which the shares of common stock represented by such proxy are entitled to vote.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Summary

1

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors

4

Proposal No. 2: Increase the Number of Authorized Shares of Common Stock

5

Proposal No. 3: Approval of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan

6

Proposal No. 4: Approval of the 2006 Annual Incentive Plan

14

Proposal No. 5: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

16

Security Ownership by Management and Principal Stockholders

17

Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters

18

Continuing Director Information

23

Director Compensation

24

Executive Compensation

25

Report of the Executive Compensation Committee

28

Employment Agreements and Change in Control Arrangements

30

Report of the Audit Committee

34

Performance Graph

35

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

36

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

36

Independent Auditors

37

Stockholder Proposals

38

Other Matters

39

Electronic Delivery of Future Annual Meeting Materials

39

Appendix A: Proposed Amendment to Charter

Appendix B: 2006 Stock Incentive Plan

Appendix C: 2006 Annual Incentive Plan



SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information from this Proxy Statement and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand the proposals fully, you should carefully read this entire Proxy Statement, as well as the other documents to which we refer you, including the proposed amendment to our charter and the proposed 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and 2006 Annual Incentive Plan, each of which is attached as an Appendix to this Proxy Statement. We have included page references in parentheses to direct you to a more complete discussion of the proposals presented in this Proxy Statement.

General Information

Date, Time and Place of Meeting

The annual meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. Central time at Hotel Crescent Court, 400 Crescent Court, Dallas, Texas 75201.

Record Date

The record date for the annual meeting is March 31, 2006. Stockholders who hold shares of our stock at the close of business on the record date will be entitled to vote on the matters proposed in this Proxy Statement.

Voting Information

You can vote in person at the annual meeting or by proxy without attending the annual meeting. The shares represented by a properly executed proxy will be voted as you direct. To vote by proxy, you must fill out your proxy card and return it by mail, vote by telephone using the instructions on your proxy card or vote via the Internet using the instructions on your proxy card.

You can revoke your proxy any time before it is exercised by written notice delivered to the Company’s Secretary, by timely delivery of a later signed proxy (including an Internet or telephone vote), or by voting in person at the annual meeting.

Quorum

The presence in person or by proxy of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the meeting for the election of directors and for the other proposals. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining whether a quorum exits.

The Proposals

Election of Directors (page 4)

Steven J. Hilton, Raymond Oppel, William G. Campbell and Richard T. Burke, Sr., each of whom is presently serving as a Class I Director, are nominated for re-election.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “for” each of these directors. If a quorum is present, the four nominees who receive a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting will be elected. Broker non-votes and votes that are withheld have no effect on the results of the vote. Please vote on this matter.

1



Amendment to Charter to
Increase Authorized Shares of Common Stock (page 5)



Our second proposal asks you to approve an amendment to our charter that would increase the number of shares of common stock the Company is authorized to issue from 50,000,000 to 125,000,000. As of February 28, 2006, the Company had 30,517,412 shares of common stock issued and outstanding or reserved for issuance pursuant to various incentive plans or the exercise of awards under such plans. We are asking you to approve an increase to our authorized capital to ensure that the Company will have sufficient shares of common stock available to meet the Company’s future business needs. Although the Company has no current plans for the use of such shares, we may use such shares for, among other things, stock splits, stock dividends, public or private stock offerings or acquisitions.

The Board of Directors has approved this amendment and recommends a vote “for” this proposal. An affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter is required to approve the amendment to our charter. Broker non-votes and abstentions have the same effect as a vote against this proposal, so please vote.

Approval of the 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan (page 6)


In our third proposal, we are asking for your approval of the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. Under this plan, the Company’s executives, officers, employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors are eligible to receive awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, performance share awards and performance based awards. We are asking you to approve this plan to assist the Executive Compensation Committee, which administers the plan, in attracting, motivating and retaining experienced, qualified and productive executive personnel, with equity grants that align the interests of management and stockholders.

The Board of Directors has approved this plan and recommends a vote “for” this proposal. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal is required for approval of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, provided that the total vote cast on the proposal represents over 50% in interest of all securities entitled to vote on the proposal. For purposes of the vote on the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against the proposal, unless holders of more than 50% in interest of all securities entitled to vote on the proposal cast votes, in which event broker non-votes will not have any effect on the result of the vote.

2



Approval of 2006 Annual
Incentive Plan (page 14)


We are also asking you to approve the Company’s 2006 Annual Incentive Plan. The purpose of this plan is to provide for annual incentive rewards that are deductible under the Internal Revenue Code to the Company’s key executives, including Steven J. Hilton and John R. Landon, our Co-CEOs, Larry W. Seay, Richard T. Morgan and C. Timothy White. This plan is administered by our Executive Compensation Committee and provides for cash awards payable to these employees upon the attainment of certain predetermined performance goals for the Company. This plan serves to align the interests of eligible employees with the interests of our stockholders and seeks to ensure that amounts payable under the plan are tax deductible.

The Board of Directors has approved this plan and recommends a vote “for” this proposal. If a quorum is present, an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting is required to approve the 2006 Annual Incentive Plan. Broker non-votes and abstentions have no effect on the result of the vote.

Ratification of Auditor (page 16)

Our final proposal asks you to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2006 fiscal year.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “for” this proposal. If a quorum is present, an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting is required to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent auditor. If the appointment is not approved by the stockholders, the adverse vote will be considered a direction to the Audit Committee to consider other auditors for next year. However, because of the difficulty in making any substitution of auditors so long after the beginning of the current year, the appointment in 2006 will stand, unless the Audit Committee finds other good reason for making a change.

3



ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Proposal No. 1)

 

Our Board of Directors currently has nineeight members. The directors are divided into two classes serving staggered two-year terms. This year our Class III Directors are up for election. The Board, upon the recommendation of theits Nominating/Governance Committee, has nominated John R. Landon, RobertSteven J. Hilton, Raymond Oppel, William G. Sarver, Peter L. Ax, C. Timothy WhiteCampbell and Gerald W. Haddock,Richard T. Burke, Sr., who are presently serving as Class III Directors, for re-election.

 

In addition, Richard T. Burke, Sr., a Class I Director who was appointed in September 2004, will stand for election to serve until the 2006 annual meeting.Their biographical information is set forth below:

 

A third-party search firm was used in identifying and recommending Mr. Burke and Mr. Haddock as candidates for our Board of Directors.  The search firm presented to our Board lists of qualified individuals who indicated an interest in serving as a director.  Board members interviewed the candidates, and Mr. Burke and Mr. Haddock were appointed in September 2004 and January 2005, respectively.

All nominees have consented to serve as directors.  The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to act as a director.  However, should a nominee become unable to serve or if a vacancy should occur before election, the Board may either reduce its size or designate a substitute nominee.  If a substitute nominee is named, the Board will vote the proxies held by it for the election of the substitute nominee.  In the vote on the election of the director nominees, stockholders may:

vote FOR all nominees;

vote to WITHHOLD votes for all nominees; or

WITHHOLD votes as to specific nominees.

Unless you tell us by your proxy to vote differently, we will vote your properly completed proxy FOR the Board’s nominees.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE
ELECTION OF THE ABOVE-NAMED NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS.

2



DIRECTOR INFORMATION

Steven J. Hilton, 43,44, ishas been co-chairman and co-chief executive officer of Meritage Homes Corporation.Corporation since 1997. Mr. Hilton foundedco-founded Arizona-based Monterey Homes in 1985. Under Mr. Hilton’s leadership, Monterey became publicly traded and combined with Legacy Homes in 1997, which thereafter became Meritage. Mr. Hilton received his Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from the University of Arizona and is a director of Western Alliance Bancorporation, a $2.2$2.6 billion community bank.

John R. Landon, 47, is co-chairman and co-chief executive officer of Meritage Homes Corporation.  Mr. Landon founded Texas-based Legacy Homesbank based in 1987, which became a part of Meritage in 1997.  Prior to founding Legacy Homes, Mr. Landon’s experience included land acquisition and development operations for a large homebuilder, sales and land development for the Trammel Crow Residential Group and public accounting with Ernst & Whinney.  Mr. Landon received his undergraduate degree in accounting from Louisiana State University.

Robert G. Sarver, 43, has been a director since December 1996, and is the chairman and chief executive officer of Western Alliance Bancorporation, a director of Skywest Airlines, and the managing partner of the Phoenix Suns basketball team.  He was the chairman and chief executive officer of California Bank & Trust from 1998 to 2001.  From 1995 to 1998, he served as chairman of Grossmont Bank.  In 1990, Mr. Sarver co-founded and currently serves as the executive director of Southwest Value Partners and Affiliates, a real estate investment company.  Mr. Sarver founded the National Bank of Arizona and was its President until its acquisition by Zions Bancorporation in 1994.  Mr. Sarver has been a certified public accountant.Las Vegas, Nevada.

 

Raymond Oppel, 48,49, has been a director since December 1997. He was the co-founder, chairman and chief executive officer of the Oppel Jenkins Group, a regional homebuilder in Texas and New Mexico, which was sold in 1995 to the public homebuilder KB Home. Mr. Oppel is a licensed real estate broker and currently is active as a private investor in real estate development and land banking. Mr. Oppel has over 1516 years of experience in the homebuilding business.

 

Peter L. Ax, 46, has been a director since September 2000 and is the managing partner of Phoenix Capital Management, an investment banking and merchant banking firm.  Mr. Ax is the former chairman and chief executive officer of SpinCycle, Inc., a publicly held consolidator and developer of coin-operated Laundromats.  Previously, Mr. Ax served as head of the Private Equity Division and senior vice president of Lehman Brothers in New York.  Mr. Ax is also on the board of directors of CashX, Inc. and Medit Marketing, Inc.  Mr. Ax also serves on the Advisory Board of Directors of Cascadia Capital, a Seattle based investment banking and merchant banking firm.  Mr. Ax holds an M.B.A. from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, a law degree from the University of Arizona, and has been a certified public accountant.  He has also been an accounting instructor at the Wharton School.

William G. Campbell, 46,47, has been a director since May 2002. Mr. Campbell is a co-founder and managing director of Knightsbridge Realty Capital, Inc., an advisory firm that plans and implements capitalization strategies for commercial real estate. Prior to forming Knightsbridge, Mr. Campbell was division manager of FINOVA Realty Capital, the commercial real estate financing division of the FINOVA Group. From 1995 until its acquisition by FINOVA in 1997, Mr. Campbell was chief operating officer of Belgravia Capital Corporation, a nationwide commercial mortgage-banking firm. Mr. Campbell holds an M.B.A. from Pepperdine University and has been a certified public accountant.

 

C. Timothy White, 44, has been a director since December 1996, and served as a director of Monterey Homes from February 1995 until December 1996.  Mr. White is a partner in the national law firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, where his practice focuses on representation of homebuilders.  Greenberg Traurig provides legal services to Meritage.  From 1989 to October 2002, Mr. White was an attorney with the law firm of Tiffany & Bosco, P.A., which also provided legal services to Meritage.

3



Richard T. Burke, Sr., 61,62, was appointed as a director in September 2004. Mr. Burke is on the Board of Directors of UnitedHealth Group, which he founded, took public in 1984 and served as chairman and chief executive officer until 1988. From 1995 until 2001, Mr. Burke was the owner and chief executive officer of the Phoenix Coyotes, a National Hockey League team. Mr. Burke is also a director of First Cash Financial Services, Inc.

 

Gerald W. Haddock, 57, was appointed in January 2005.  Mr. Haddock is the founder of Haddock Enterprises, LLC and formerly servedAll nominees have consented to serve as President and CEO of Crescent Real Estate Equities.  He is currently a Director and Audit Committee Chairman of ENSCO International, Inc., a leading global offshore oil and gas drilling service company listed on the NYSE.  In late 2004, Mr. Haddock joined thedirectors. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of Cano Petroleum, Inc.,the nominees will be unable to act as a Fort Worth-based producer of crude oil and natural gas that specializes in enhanced recovery technology.  He also serves for Baylor Universitydirector. However, should a nominee become unable to serve or should a vacancy on the Baylor Foundation Board occur before the annual meeting, the Board may either reduce its size or designate a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is named, your shares will be voted for the election of Directors and servesthe substitute nominee. In the vote on the Dean’s Strategic Councilelection of the director nominees, stockholders may:

vote FOR all nominees;

vote to WITHHOLD votes for all nominees; or

WITHHOLD votes as to specific nominees.

Unless you tell us by your proxy to vote differently, your shares will be voted FORthe Graduate Tax Program at New York University.Board’s nominees.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE
ELECTION OF THE ABOVE-NAMED NOMINEES AS DIRECTORS.

 

4



 

APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF

AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

(Proposal No. 2)

The Company’s charter presently authorizes the issuance of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share. On February 28, 2006, 26,819,620 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. On that date, 2,997,792 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance pursuant to the Meritage Homes Corporation Stock Option Plan, and 700,000 were reserved for issuance pursuant to the Meritage Homes Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, subject to stockholder approval of the plan at this meeting (collectively, the “Company Plans”). Accordingly, of the 50,000,000 shares of common stock currently authorized, the Company has approximately 30,517,412 shares of common stock issued and outstanding or reserved for issuance pursuant to the Company Plans or pursuant to the exercise of awards granted under such plans.

The purpose of the proposed amendment is to ensure that the Company has adequate authorized shares of common stock available from time to time if needed for such corporate purposes as may be deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors. These corporate purposes might include, among other things, stock splits, stock dividends, public or private stock offerings or acquisitions. Although we have no specific plans or commitments for the issuance of the additional shares of common stock for which authorization is solicited, the Board of Directors believes that it would be desirable for the stockholders to authorize such additional shares at this time so that the Company is prepared to meet possible future needs for such shares without delay.

The proposed amendment to the charter would increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 50,000,000 to 125,000,000. If additional shares of common stock are issued, it may have a dilutive effect on earnings per share. In addition, the issuance of additional shares may have a dilutive effect on the voting power of the current stock owners because such stock owners do not have preemptive rights with respect to the issuance of additional shares of common stock, including the shares of common stock to be authorized by the proposed amendment. The full text of the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is set forth in Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

If the proposed amendment to the charter is adopted, the additional authorized shares of common stock could be issued at the discretion of the Board of Directors for any corporate purpose, including those mentioned above, without further action by the stock owners, except as may be required by applicable laws or regulations, or the rules of the NYSE. While in certain instances an issuance of additional shares could have the effect of rendering a hostile attempt to acquire the Company more difficult, the Board of Directors is not aware of any circumstance potentially having such an anti-takeover effect.

Following approval, the amendment to the charter would become effective on the date the amendment is filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland. It is anticipated that the appropriate filing to effect the share increase will be made as soon as practicable following approval of this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS APPROVED THIS PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE COMPANY’S CHARTER TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FROM 50,000,000 TO 125,000,000 AND RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ADOPTION OF PROPOSAL NO. 2.

5



APPROVE THE MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

(Proposal No. 3)

General

The Company is seeking stockholder approval of the Meritage Homes Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Stock Plan”). Our Board of Directors adopted the 2006 Stock Plan on February 15, 2006, and is effective on the date approved by the stockholders at the annual meeting. If approved, the 2006 Stock Plan will replace the current Meritage Homes Corporation Stock Option Plan, as amended (the “Old Plan”), which expires later in 2006.

As of December 31, 2005, there were 490,550 shares of common stock available for future awards under the Old Plan. If the stockholders approve the 2006 Stock Plan, the number of shares of common stock that will be available for issuance under the 2006 Stock Plan will be 700,000 shares, plus any shares available for future awards under the Old Plan as of the date of the annual meeting (to the extent not ultimately granted under the Old Plan prior to its expiration). The closing sales price of our common stock on March 15, 2006 was $55.57 per share.

We have developed our compensation policies with the goals of attracting, motivating and retaining experienced, qualified and productive personnel, rewarding superior performance and providing incentives that are based on our performance, as well as aligning the interests of our employees and stockholders. The 2006 Stock Plan is designed to help us achieve these objectives by providing us the flexibility to grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and performance shares (each, an “Award”).

In addition to helping us achieve these objectives, our Board of Directors believes that the provisions of the 2006 Stock Plan reflect the Company’s continued commitment to strong corporate governance practices in the interest of its stockholders in the following ways:

the 2006 Stock Plan prohibits stock option repricing without stockholder approval, other than in connection with a change in the Company’s capitalization as described below in “Change in Capitalization;”

the 2006 Stock Plan prohibits issuing stock options or stock appreciation rights with an exercise price below fair market value on the date of grant; and

in order to account for the difference in the value of a grant of stock options or stock appreciation rights versus a grant of full value shares (i.e., restricted stock or performance share awards), the 2006 Stock Plan provides a formula to determine the total number of shares of common stock available for future Awards, pursuant to which the availability will be reduced by one share for each one share issued in connection with a stock option or stock appreciation right and by 1.38 shares for each one share issued in connection with any other type of Award.

The number of shares subject to options outstanding under the Old Plan as of December 31, 2005 is 2,799,282 shares. These outstanding options have a weighted average exercise price of $27.90 and a weighted average remaining term of 4.7 years.

The following summary description of the 2006 Stock Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2006 Stock Plan, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B.

Shares Subject to the 2006 Plan

The total number of shares of common stock available for grants of Awards under the 2006 Stock Plan is 700,000, plus any shares of common stock available for future awards under the Old Plan as of the date of the Annual Meeting (to the extent not ultimately granted under the Old Plan prior to its expiration), which is estimated to be another 490,550 shares. As noted above, the total number of shares of common stock available for future Awards will be reduced by one share for each one share issued in connection with an option or a stock appreciation right and by 1.38 shares for each one share issued in connection with any other type of Award.

6



Except as provided below, shares of common stock subject to an Award that have been cancelled, expired, forfeited or otherwise not issued under the Award will again become available for grants of Awards under the 2006 Stock Plan. However, shares of common stock that are used to pay the exercise price of the Award or are delivered or withheld to pay withholding taxes or that were subject to a stock-settled stock appreciation right but not issued in such settlement will be counted against the total number of shares of common stock available for grants of Awards.

The shares to be delivered under the 2006 Stock Plan may consist of, in whole or in part, shares of common stock that are authorized but unissued or shares that were reacquired by the Company, whether on the open market or otherwise.

Administration

The 2006 Stock Plan will be administered by the Executive Compensation Committee (the “Committee”). The Committee has the authority to interpret and administer the 2006 Stock Plan in order to carry out the purposes of the 2006 Stock Plan. The Committee has the authority to determine those persons eligible to receive Awards, the number of shares subject to an award and to establish and interpret the terms and conditions of any Awards. The Committee may also make exceptions to the provisions of any Awards. All determinations of the Committee are final and binding.

Eligibility

Awards may be made to any officer, employee or executive of the Company, as well as to non-employee directors and consultants or advisors to the Company. As of December 31, 2005, there were six non-employee directors and approximately 1,810 officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries eligible to participate in the 2006 Stock Plan. The number of eligible participants is expected to increase over time based upon future growth of the Company.

Types of Awards

The 2006 Stock Plan provides for grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares and performance-based awards, whether granted alone or in combination, pursuant to which shares of common stock, cash or a combination thereof may be delivered to the Award recipient; provided that stock appreciation rights will be paid only in shares.

Options. An option is the right to purchase shares of common stock at a future date at a specified exercise price. The Committee may grant both nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options under the 2006 Stock Plan. The per share exercise price will be determined by the Committee, but must be at least equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the date of grant. The Committee determines the date after which options may be exercised in whole or in part and the expiration date of each option, which cannot be more than ten years from the date of grant. However, in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a participant who holds more than 10% of the voting power of the Company, the exercise price must be at least 110% of the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the date of grant and the expiration date cannot be more than five years from the date of grant. The exercise price of an option may be paid in shares of common stock, cash or a combination thereof, as determined by the Committee, including an irrevocable commitment by a broker to pay the exercise price from the proceeds of a sale of shares issuable under the option, the delivery of previously owned shares or withholding of shares deliverable upon exercise. Options cannot be repriced (or cancelled and regranted at a lower exercise price) other than in connection with a change in the Company’s capitalization as described below in “Change in Capitalization.”

Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock appreciation right is a right granted to the participant to receive, in shares of common stock, an amount equal to the appreciation of one share of common stock from the date of grant.

Restricted Stock Awards. A restricted stock award involves an immediate transfer of ownership of a fixed number of shares of common stock to the participant, although the shares are subject to a risk of forfeiture or to other conditions or restrictions during specified periods of time. The participant is immediately entitled to voting, dividend and

7



other ownership rights in such shares. The Committee has discretion to waive in whole or in part restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to the restricted stock award.

Performance Share Awards. Performance share awards are rights to receive, in cash, shares of common stock or a combination thereof, an amount equal to the value of common stock if certain performance goals are attained.

Performance-Based Awards. The purpose of performance-based awards is to qualify restricted stock or performance share awards as “performance-based compensation” pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code. Section 162(m) of the Code limits the Company’s federal income tax deduction for compensation paid to any of the executive officers named in the summary compensation table of its annual proxy statement. The limit is $1 million per officer per year, with certain exceptions. However, the deductibility limit does not apply to “performance-based compensation” if the qualifying performance criteria are approved in advance by the Company’s stockholders. Stockholder approval of this proposal will constitute stockholder approval of the qualifying performance criteria for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.

For performance-based Awards, the Committee has the discretion to select the length of the performance period, the qualifying performance criteria and the level of the performance goal. For this purpose, the “qualifying performance criteria” will be any one or more of the following:

                  pre- or after-tax net earnings;

                  earnings before interest expense (including interest amortized to cost of sales) and income taxes (EBIT);

                  earnings before interest expense (including interest amortized to cost of sales), income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA);

                  revenue growth;

                  operating income;

                  operating cash flow;

                  return on net assets;

                  return on stockholders’ equity;

                  return on assets;

                  return on capital;

                  share price growth;

                  shareholder returns;

                  gross or net profit margin;

                  earnings per share;

                  price per share; and

                  market share;

any of which may be measured in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or as compared to results of a peer group.

Notwithstanding the satisfaction of the performance criteria, the number of shares issued under or the amount paid under an Award may be reduced by the Committee on the basis of such further considerations as the Committee in its sole discretion may determine.

Limitations of Awards

The 2006 Stock Plan provides that participants may not receive Awards with respect to more than 100,000 shares of common stock during any calendar year.

Transferability Restrictions

Except as otherwise permitted by the Committee and certain transfers to family members, participants generally may not sell, transfer, pledge, assign or otherwise alienate or hypothecate Awards granted under the 2006 Stock Plan

8



other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and each option and stock appreciation right is generally exercisable only by a participant during his or her lifetime.

Change in Capitalization

The Committee shall adjust the number and kind of shares available for issuance under the 2006 Stock Plan and the number and kind of shares subject to the limitations described above in “Limitations of Awards” in the event of a recapitalization, consolidation, combination or exchange of shares, stock split, spin-off, stock dividend or similar corporate change that affects the number or kind of shares of the Company outstanding. The Committee may also adjust the exercise price, number or kind of shares subject to individual Awards and other terms to reflect the foregoing events.

Change in Control

If a change of control occurs and Awards are converted, assumed, or replaced by a successor, the Committee has the discretion to cause all outstanding Awards to become fully exercisable and all restrictions on outstanding Awards to lapse. If a change of control occurs and the Awards are not converted, assumed, or replaced by a successor, all outstanding Awards shall automatically become fully exercisable and all restrictions on outstanding Awards shall lapse.

Amendment to or Termination of the 2006 Stock Plan

The Committee with the Board’s approval may amend, alter or discontinue the 2006 Stock Plan. However, other than in connection with a change in the Company’s capitalization as described above in “Change in Capitalization,” no amendment may be made without stockholder approval if such amendment would:

                  increase the maximum number of shares of common stock for which Awards may be granted under the 2006 Stock Plan;

                  permit the Committee to grant options with an exercise price that is below the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant;

                  permit the Committee to extend the exercise period for an option beyond ten years from the date of grant;

                  permit the Committee to reprice previously-granted options; or

                  require stockholder approval under any laws, regulating or stock exchange rule.

9



New Plan Benefits

As of the date of this proxy statement, no Awards have been made under the 2006 Stock Plan. The benefits that will be awarded or paid under the 2006 Stock Plan are not currently determinable. The following table sets forth grants of options made under the Old Plan during 2005 to (i) each of the executive officers named on page 17; (ii) each of the director nominees for election (iii) all current executive officers, as a group; (iv) all current directors and director nominees who are not executive officers, as a group; (v) all employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group.

Individual or Group Name

 

Number of Shares
Subject to Options
Granted

 

Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Per Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Officers

 

 

 

 

 

John R. Landon (1)

 

50,000

 

$

58.62

 

Steven J. Hilton(1) (2)

 

50,000

 

58.62

 

Larry W. Seay

 

20,000

 

58.62

 

C. Timothy White

 

20,000

 

70.38

 

Richard T. Morgan

 

12,500

 

59.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director Nominees

 

 

 

 

 

Raymond Oppel

 

5,000

 

$

58.62

 

William G. Campbell

 

5,000

 

58.62

 

Richard T. Burke

 

5,000

 

58.62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Officer Group (5 persons)

 

152,500

 

$

60.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Executive Officer Director Group (5 persons) (3)

 

30,000

 

$

58.62

 

Non-Executive Officer Employee Group (101 persons)

 

406,250

 

$

60.61

 

All non-employees

 

 

 

 

 


(1)John R. Landon and Steven J. Hilton each received more than 5% of the options granted in 2005.

(2)Steven J. Hilton is also a director nominee.

(3)Excludes C. Timothy White

Accounting Treatment

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”)  SFAS 123(R) requires that companies measure and recognize compensation expense at an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted under compensation arrangements. SFAS 123(R) became effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The estimated impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) is estimated to result in a reduction of net earnings ranging from approximately $8 million to $9 million in 2006 depending on, among other things, the number of options granted and the price of our stock, as well as the assumptions used to value options granted, such as the volatility of our stock, risk-free interest rates, employee exercise patterns and employee forfeiture rates.

U.S. Federal Tax Consequences

The following is only a summary of the consequences of U.S. federal income taxation to the participant and the Company with respect to the grant and exercise of Awards under the 2006 Stock Plan. The summary is not complete, does not discuss the income tax laws of any state or foreign country in which a participant may reside, and is subject to change. Participants in the 2006 Stock Plan should consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific tax consequences to them of participating in and receiving Awards under the 2006 Stock Plan.

10



Nonqualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. Generally, a participant will not recognize income upon the grant of a nonqualified stock option or a stock appreciation right; instead, the holder of a nonqualified stock option or a stock appreciation right will recognize ordinary income at the time of exercise in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the common stock at the time of exercise over the exercise price. Upon a subsequent sale of the shares of common stock received upon exercise, the difference between the net proceeds of sale and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise will generally be taxed as capital gain or loss (long-term or short-term, depending on the holding period).

Incentive Stock Options. A participant will not recognize income upon the grant of an incentive stock option. In addition, a participant will not recognize income upon the exercise of an incentive stock option if the participant satisfied certain employment and holding period requirements. To satisfy the employment requirement, a participant must exercise the option not later than three months after he or she ceases to be an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (or later than one year if he or she is disabled), unless he or she has died. To satisfy the holding period requirement, a participant must hold the stock acquired upon exercise of the incentive stock option more than two years from the date of grant of the stock option and more than one year after the transfer of the shares of common stock to him or her. If these requirements are satisfied, on the sale of such stock, the participant will be taxed on any gain, measured by the difference between the option price and the net proceeds of sale, generally at long-term capital gains rates.

If shares of common stock acquired upon the timely exercise of an incentive stock option are sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of without satisfying the holding period requirements (a “disqualifying disposition”), the participant will, in the usual case, recognize (i) capital gain in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the sales price over the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise; (ii) ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the lesser of the sales price or the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the option price of the option; and (iii) capital loss equal to the excess, if any, of the option price over the sales price.

Individuals are subject to an “alternative minimum tax” based upon an expanded tax base to the extent such tax exceeds the regular tax liability. The amount by which the fair market value of the shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option exceeds the exercise price will be included as a positive adjustment in the calculation of the employee’s “alternative minimum taxable income” in the year of exercise. The “alternative minimum tax” imposed on individual taxpayers is generally equal to the amount by which a specified percentage of the individual’s alternative minimum taxable income (reduced by certain exemption amounts) exceeds his or her regular income tax liability for the year.

Stock options otherwise qualifying as incentive stock options will be treated as nonqualified stock options to the extent that the aggregate fair market value of stock with respect to which incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by a participant during any calendar year (under all of the Company’s plans) exceeds $100,000 based on the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant.

Restricted Stock. A participant will not recognize income upon the grant of restricted stock. If the participant makes an election under Code Section 83(b) within 30 days after receiving the shares of restricted stock, however, he or she will recognize ordinary income in the year of receipt in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of such shares (determined without regard to the restrictions imposed by the 2006 Stock Plan) at the time of transfer over any amount paid by the participant. Then, upon the sale of such stock, the difference between the fair market value at the time of transfer and the net proceeds of sale will generally be taxed as capital gain or loss (long-term or short-term, depending on the holding period). If a participant makes a Section 83(b) election with respect to shares of common stock that are subsequently forfeited, he or she will not be entitled to deduct any amount previously included in income by reason of such election. If a participant does not make a Section 83(b) election, the participant will recognize ordinary income in the year or years in which the award of restricted stock vests and any restrictions imposed by the 2006 Stock Plan on the Award terminate in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of such shares on the date the restrictions expire or are removed over any amount paid by the participant. If a Section 83(b) election has not been made, any dividends received with respect to shares of common stock subject to restrictions will be treated as additional compensation income and not as dividend income.

11



Performance Shares. A participant will not recognize income upon the grant of a performance share. The participant will recognize ordinary income in the year paid equal to the fair market value of shares of common stock or cash received.

Withholding Taxes. Generally, the Company will be required to withhold applicable taxes with respect to any ordinary income recognized by a participant in connection with Awards granted under the 2006 Stock Plan. The Committee may permit a participant to pay withholding taxes through the mandatory or elective sale of shares of common stock, by electing to have the Company withhold a portion of the shares that would otherwise be issued upon exercise of an Award (based upon the minimum statutory withholding amount) or by tendering shares already owned by the participant for more than six months.

Awards of performance shares under the 2006 Stock Plan may, in some cases, result in the deferral of compensation that is subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. To date, the U.S. Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service have issued only proposed regulations and other preliminary guidance regarding the impact of Section 409A on the taxation of these types of Awards. It is the intent of the Company that Awards under the 2006 Stock Plan will be structured and administered in a manner that complies with the requirements of Section 409A.

The Company will generally be entitled to a tax deduction corresponding in amount and time to the participant’s recognition of ordinary income in the circumstances described above, provided, among other things, that such deduction meets the test of reasonableness and is an ordinary and necessary business expense. However, in connection with a change in control of the Company, and depending upon the terms and conditions of Awards granted under the 2006 Stock Plan and upon the individual circumstances of the participants, certain amounts with respect to Awards granted under the 2006 Stock Plan may constitute “excess parachute payments” under the “golden parachute” provisions of Section 280G of the Code. Under these provisions, a participant will be subject to a 20% excise tax on any “excess parachute payment” and the Company will be denied any deduction with respect to such payment. In addition, as described above, in certain instances as a result of the application of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company may be denied a compensation deduction for Awards grated to certain officers that do not qualify as “performance-based compensation” to the extent their aggregate compensation exceeds $1 million in a given year.

12



Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plan

The following table summarizes our equity compensation under all of our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2005:

Plan Category

 

(a)
Number of Shares to
Be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights

 

(b)
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights

 

(c)
Number of
Securities Remaining
Available for Future
Issuance under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))

 

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

 

2,799,282

 

$

27.90

 

490,550

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders

 

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

2,799,282

 

$

27.90

 

490,550

 

Securities Registration

We intend to register the shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2006 Stock Plan under a Registration Statement on Form S-8 to be filed with the SEC after approval of the 2006 Stock Plan by our stockholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS APPROVED THIS PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE

MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN AS ATTACHED AS APPENDIX B AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL NO. 3.

13



APPROVE THE MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION 2006 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

(Proposal No. 4)

The Board of Directors has adopted the Meritage Homes Corporation 2006 Annual Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”). The Incentive Plan will become effective as of February 15, 2006, subject to stockholder approval at the annual meeting. No award may be made under the Incentive Plan after its expiration date, but awards made prior thereto may extend beyond that date.

The Incentive Plan will provide for annual incentive awards to certain of the Company’s key executives and is being submitted to stockholders in an effort to assure that awards under the Plan will be tax deductible for the Company. Section 162(m) of the Code places a $1 million annual limit on the amount of compensation paid to the executive officers named in the summary compensation table of the Company’s annual proxy statement that may be deducted by the Company for federal income tax purposes, unless such compensation is based on the achievement of pre-established performance goal(s) set by the Executive Compensation Committee pursuant to an incentive plan that has been approved by the Company’s stockholders. Stockholder approval of the Plan is necessary for maintaining the tax-deductible status of incentive payments made to the participants.

We have summarized below the key provisions of the Incentive Plan. Because it is a summary, it may not contain all of the information that is important to you. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2006 Annual Incentive Plan, which is attached as Appendix C to this Proxy Statement.

Purpose of the Plan

Awards may be made under the Incentive Plan to any employee of the Company who is a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. A covered employee includes Meritage’s Co-Chief Executive Officers and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company. Non-employee directors are not eligible to receive an award under the Incentive Plan.

Administration

The Incentive Plan will be administered by the Executive Compensation Committee or any other committee appointed by the Board of Directors (the “Committee”), which consists of not less than two non-employee directors who are “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Committee has full authority to interpret the Plan and to establish rules for its administration. The Committee has the authority to determine eligibility for participation in the Incentive Plan, to decide all questions concerning eligibility for and the amount of awards, and to establish and administer the performance goals (defined below) and certify whether, and to what extent, they are attained.

Determination of Awards

In determining awards to be made under the Incentive Plan, the Committee may approve a formula that is based on one or more objective criteria to measure corporate performance as set forth in the Plan (“Performance Criteria”). The Committee may establish Performance Criteria and as selected by the Committee, the Committee may set annual performance objectives (“Performance Goals”) with respect to such Performance Criteria for the Company. Performance Criteria must include one or more of the following:  pre- or after-tax net earnings; earnings before interest expense (including interest amortized to cost of sales) and income taxes (“EBIT”); earnings before interest expense (including interest amortized to cost of sales), income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”); revenue growth; operating income; operating cash flow; return on net assets; return on shareholders’ equity; return on assets; return on capital; share price growth; shareholder returns; gross or net profit margin; earnings per share; price per share; and market share, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms, or as compared to any incremental increase, or as compared to results of a peer group. The Committee may provide that the Performance Criteria may include or exclude extraordinary charges, non-recurring or unusual items, accounting charges or similar items. The Committee shall, within the time prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code, define in an objective fashion the manner of calculating the Performance Criteria it selects to use for such Performance Period for the participants.

14



Payment of awards will be made in cash. The Committee will make all determinations regarding the achievement of Performance Goals and the determination of actual awards. The Committee may in its discretion decrease, but not increase, the amount of any award that otherwise would be payable under the Incentive Plan.

Amount Available and Maximum Individual Awards

The Committee shall determine the amount available for awards in any year. The maximum award payable to any employee for a performance period is 1.85% of EBITDA, before consideration of bonuses paid to covered employees.

Amendment and Termination

The Committee may suspend or terminate the Incentive Plan at any time with or without prior notice. In addition, the Committee may from time to time and with or without prior notice, amend or modify the Incentive Plan in any manner, but may not without stockholder approval adopt any amendment that would require the vote of stockholders of the Company pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code.

New Plan Benefits

As of the date of this proxy statement, the Committee has made performance-based bonus awards to four covered employees for 2006. These awards are subject to approval of the Incentive Plan by the Company’s stockholders at the annual meeting. Subject to the approval of the 2006 Plan, the Committee has approved the following performance-based awards:

                  to John R. Landon and Steven J. Hilton (Co-CEOs), for the performance period (fiscal 2006), a bonus equal to .825% of EBITDA (before consideration of bonuses paid to certain executive officers and one-time financing charges) if the Company’s return on assets is in the top half of public homebuilders having revenues of $500 million or more per year, and an additional .825% of EBITDA if the Company’s return on equity is in the top half of these public builders. If either measurement falls within the 33% to 49% percentile, the bonus shall be .5363% of EBITDA for the applicable measurement. If either measurement falls below the 33% threshold, then there will not be any formula bonus paid with respect to such measurement;

                  to Larry W. Seay (Chief Financial Officer), for the performance period (fiscal 2006), a bonus equal to .20% of EBITDA (before consideration of bonuses paid to certain executive officers and one-time financing charges) if the Company’s return on assets is in the top half of public homebuilders having revenues of $500 million or more per year, and an additional .20% of EBITDA if the Company’s return on equity is in the top half of these public builders. If either measurement falls within the 33% to 49% percentile, the bonus shall be .13% of EBITDA for the applicable measurement. If either measurement falls below the 33% threshold, then there will not be any formula bonus paid with respect to such measurement; and

                  to C. Timothy White (General Counsel), for each of the next two performance periods (fiscal 2006 and 2007), a bonus equal to .1125% of EBITDA (before consideration of bonuses paid to certain executive officers and one-time financing charges).

The benefits to be paid under the Incentive Plan are not currently determinable. During 2005, the Company paid to Messrs. Landon, Hilton and Seay performance-based incentive compensation based on substantially similar performance criteria of $8,806,808, $8,606,808 and $2,086,984, respectively.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS APPROVED THIS PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION 2006 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN AS ATTACHED AS APPENDIX C AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL NO. 4.

15



RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

(Proposal No. 5)

The Board of Directors seeks an indication from stockholders of their approval or disapproval of the Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2006.

Deloitte & Touche LLP was appointed our auditor in 2005 and no relationship exists other than the usual relationship between auditors and clients.

If the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors for 2006 is not approved by stockholders, the adverse vote will be considered a direction to the Audit Committee to consider other auditors for next year. However, because of the difficulty in making any substitution of auditors so long after the beginning of the current year, the appointment in 2006 will stand, unless the Audit Committee finds other good reason for making a change.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS APPROVED THIS PROPOSAL NO. 5 AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 5.

16



SECURITY OWNERSHIP BY MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

Management.The following table summarizes, as of March 31, 2005,15, 2006, the number and percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock beneficially owned by the following:

 

each Meritage director and nominee for director;

each executive officer named in the compensation summary under “Executive Compensation”;Compensation;” and

all Meritage directors and executive officers as a group.

 

Name Of
Beneficial Owner(1)

 

Position With The Company

 

Number
Of Shares
Owned (2)

 

Right To
Acquire By
May 14, 2006

 

Total
Shares
Beneficially
Owned

 

Percent Of
Outstanding
Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John R. Landon

 

Director, Co-Chairman and Co-CEO

 

1,911,136

 

138,000

 

2,049,136

 

7.7

%

Steven J. Hilton

 

Director, Co-Chairman and Co-CEO

 

1,727,194

(3)

234,000

 

1,961,194

 

7.3

 

Robert G. Sarver

 

Director

 

428,000

(4)

62,500

 

490,500

 

1.8

 

Raymond Oppel

 

Director

 

 

32,500

 

32,500

 

 

*

Peter L. Ax

 

Director

 

 

42,500

 

42,500

 

 

*

William G. Campbell

 

Director

 

500

 

15,000

 

15,500

 

 

*

Richard T. Burke, Sr.

 

Director

 

 

7,500

 

7,500

 

 

*

Gerald W. Haddock

 

Director

 

 

5,000

 

5,000

 

 

*

Larry W. Seay

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

23,926

 

92,484

 

116,410

 

 

*

C. Timothy White

 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 

21,264

(5)

40,000

 

61,264

 

 

*

Richard T. Morgan

 

Vice President and Treasurer

 

20,106

 

48,100

 

68,206

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)

 

4,132,126

 

717,584

 

4,849,710

 

19.1

%


*Less than 1%.

(1)The address for our directors and executive officers is c/o Meritage Homes Corporation, 8501 East Princess Drive,17851 North 85th Street, Suite 290,300, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255.

(2)The amounts shown include the shares of common stock actually owned as of March 15, 2006, and the shares which the person or group had the right to acquire within 60 days of that date. The number of shares includes shares of common stock owned of record by such person’s spouse and minor children and by other related individuals and entities over whose shares of common stock such person has custody, voting control or the power of disposition.

Name Of
Beneficial Owner

 

Position With The Company

 

Number
Of Shares
Owned(1)

 

Right To
Acquire By
May 31, 2005

 

Total
Beneficial
Shares

 

Percent Of
Outstanding
Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven J. Hilton

 

Director, Co-Chairman and Co-CEO

 

1,727,194

(2)

236,800

 

1,963,994

 

7.2

%

John R. Landon

 

Director, Co-Chairman and Co-CEO

 

1,715,136

 

236,800

 

1,951,936

 

7.2

%

Robert G. Sarver

 

Director

 

808,000

(3)

75,000

 

883,000

 

3.3

%

Raymond Oppel

 

Director

 

 

25,000

 

25,000

 

 

*

Peter L. Ax

 

Director

 

 

43,000

 

43,000

 

 

*

William G. Campbell

 

Director

 

 

7,500

 

7,500

 

 

*

C. Timothy White

 

Director

 

1,264

 

75,000

 

76,264

 

 

*

Richard T. Burke, Sr.

 

Director

 

 

 

 

 

Gerald W. Haddock

 

Director

 

 

 

 

 

Larry W. Seay

 

Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Secretary

 

12,226

 

88,800

 

101,026

 

 

*

Richard T. Morgan

 

Vice President and Treasurer

 

32,106

 

30,800

 

62,906

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)

 

4,295,926

 

818,700

 

5,114,626

 

19.2

%


*Less than 1%.

(1)The amounts shown include the shares of common stock actually owned as of March 31, 2005, and the shares which the person or group had the right to acquire within 60 days of that date. In calculating the percentage of ownership, all shares of common stock which the identified person had the right to acquire within 60 days of March 31, 200515, 2006 upon exercise of options are considered as outstanding for computing the percentage of the shares owned by that person or group, but are not considered as outstanding for computing the percentage of the shares of stock owned by any other person.

 

(2)(3)          Shares are held by family trusts.

 

(3)Includes 400,000 shares pledged to an unaffiliated third party under a forward-sale contract.(4)          Mr. Sarver is deemed to beneficially own 6,000 shares through his spouse and 2,000 shares through a minor child.

 

(5)          Includes 20,000 shares pledged to a third party lending institution to secure a loan.

Certain Other Beneficial Owners.Based on filings made under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of March 31, 2005,15, 2006, the only other known beneficial owners of more than 5% of Meritage common stock are shown in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

Shares Beneficially Owned

 

Name of Other Beneficial Owners

 

Address Of Beneficial Owner

 

Number

 

Percent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EARNEST Partners, LLC (1)

 

75 14th Street, Suite 2300, Atlanta, GA 30309

 

2,057,762

 

8.0

%

FMR Corp. (2)

 

82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA 02109

 

1,486,800

 

5.8

%

HYMF Limited (3)

 

1 Walker House Mary St., P.O. Box 908 GT, George Town, Grand Cayman (Cayman Islands)

 

1,666,556

 

6.5

%

5



 

 

 

 

Shares Beneficially Owned

 

Name of Other Beneficial Owners

 

Address Of Beneficial Owner

 

Number

 

Percent

 

EARNEST Partners, LLC(1)

 

75 14th Street, Suite 2300, Atlanta, GA 30309

 

3,153,625

 

11.5

%

 


(1)          Based solely on a Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005.8, 2006. EARNEST Partners, LLC has sole voting power with respect to 1,161,000960,761 shares, shared voting power with respect to 624,1621,119,864 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,057,7623,153,625 shares.

 

(2)Based solely on Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005.  FMR Corp. has sole dispositive power with respect to 1,486,800 shares.  The interest of Fidelity Low Priced Stock Fund, an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, in Meritage common stock amounted to 1,394,400 shares at December 31, 2004.  The voting of these 1,394,400 shares is carried out under guidelines established by the fund’s Boards of Trustees.

(3)Based solely on Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005.  The shares reported are held in trust accounts for the economic benefit of the beneficiaries of those accounts.  HYMF Limited has sole voting power with respect to 1,533,412 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,666,556 shares.

617



 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND BOARD MATTERS

 

The Board of Directors is elected by the stockholders to oversee theirthe stockholders’ interests in the healthoperation and overall success of our business. The Board serves as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved to or shared withthat require a vote of our stockholders. The Board selects and oversees the members of senior management who are charged by the Board with conducting the business of the Company. Meritage has established and operates withinin accordance with a comprehensive plan of corporate governance that defines and sets high ethical standards for the purposeconduct of definingour officers and setting high standards for ethical conduct.employees. This plan provides an important framework within which the Board of Directors can pursue the Company’s strategic objectives and ensure long-term stockholder value.

 

Corporate Governance Principles and Practices

We have adopted Corporate Governance Principles and Practices that define the key elements of our corporate governance framework and philosophy, including:

 

                  director qualifications,

                  independence criteria,

                  director responsibilities,

                  our committee structure,

                  officer and director stock ownership requirements,

director resignation policy,

director access to officers and employees,

                  our philosophy with respect to director compensation,

                  requirements regarding director orientation and continuing education, and

                  our plans with respect to management succession.

 

Our Corporate Governance Principles and Practices are available on our website at www.meritagehomes.com and we will provide a print copy to any stockholder upon request. These principles are reviewed regularly by the Nominating/Governance Committee and changes are made as appropriate.

 

Director Qualification and Independence

 

Determinations regarding the eligibility of director candidates are made by the Nominating/Governance Committee, which considers the candidate’s qualifications as to age, skills, and experience in the context of the needs of the Board of Directors.Directors and our stockholders. The Nominating/Governance Committee also evaluates the independence of each candidate. Consistent with the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), at least a majority of the Board of Directors must be independent.

 

No Directordirector will be deemed to be independent unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that the Directordirector has no material relationship with the Company, either directly or as an officer, shareowner or partner of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. The Board observes all criteria established by the NYSE and other governing laws and regulations. In its annual review of Directordirector independence, the Board of Directors considers all commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable or other business relationships any Directordirector may have with the Company.

 

As a result of its annual review, the Board of Directors has determined that a majority of Meritage’s Board members are independent. Our independent directors, identified by an asterisk in the next table, are Peter Ax, Raymond Oppel, William Campbell, Richard Burke and Gerald Haddock.

In making this determination, the Board of Directors evaluated whether there exists any relationships between these individuals and Meritage. TheExcept as noted below, the Board of Directors determined that there does not existno relationship exists between Meritage and any material relationshipsindependent director. Although the Board of Directors identified and evaluated a relationship between the Company and itsRay Oppel, an independent directors.director, it determined that this relationship is not material and does not affect Mr. Oppel’s independence. Mr. Oppel had a 7.5% limited partnership interest in a joint venture that sold lots to

 

718



Hammonds Homes, which arrangement was entered into prior to our 2002 acquisition of Hammonds. Mr. Oppel earned approximately $36,000 in 2004 from this joint venture. Mr. Oppel received no earnings related to this joint venture in 2005. In addition, Mr. Oppel and his adult children collectively own an approximate 9.4% limited partnership interest in a joint venture that owns real property in Texas. Meritage has entered into a contract with the limited partnership to acquire a portion of the real property and has made deposits totaling approximately $25,000 as of December 31, 2005. The Board considered these relationships and determined that they do not impair Mr. Oppel’s independence because he holds only a limited partnership interest and as such has no control over management of the partnerships. Accordingly, Mr. Oppel is not in a position to negotiate or influence the terms of any transaction in which the partnerships may engage. Moreover, the transactions are, individually and in the aggregate, immaterial in relation to Mr. Oppel’s net worth.

 

Steven Hilton and John Landon are not considered independent because they are employed by the Company and C. Timothy White is not considered independent because he is a partner in a law firm that provides legal services to the Company.

 

Prior to 2004, Robert Sarver was deemed an independent director. The Nominating/Governance Committee has continually monitored certain minor relationships between Robert Sarver and Meritage along with relationships between Robert Sarver and our Co-ChairmanMessrs. Hilton and Co-CEO’s.Landon. In the past, RobertMessrs. Sarver, and Steven Hilton and John Landon our Co-Chairman and Co-CEO’s, had certain business relationships unrelated to Meritage. The Nominating/Governance Committee evaluated these relationships and determined that they did not impair RobertMr. Sarver’s independence because they did not involve Meritage and were insignificant in relation to Mr. Sarver’s net worth. During 2004, RobertMr. Sarver became the controlling owner of the Phoenix Suns basketball team, in which Messrs. Hilton and Landon purchased minority ownership interests. This relationship was closely evaluated by the Nominating/Governance Committee because of its significance to Messrs. Sarver, Hilton and Landon and because a pre-existing relationship between the Phoenix Suns and Meritage existed under which Meritage purchases advertising with the Phoenix Suns. Based on this ongoing evaluation, the Nominating/Governance Committee continues to believe that RobertMr. Sarver is independent within the meaning of the NYSE’s rules. Despite this belief,Indeed, the Nominating/Governance Committee believesand the Board of Directors believe Mr. Sarver is a valuable member of the Board and that the Company benefits from his extensive business experience. Despite these beliefs, the Nominating/Governance Committee concluded it is in the best interest of Meritage’s stockholders that RobertMr. Sarver not be deemed an independent director. The Nominating/Governance Committee and the Board of Directors believe that RobertAt last year’s annual meeting, Mr. Sarver is an invaluable member of the Board and adds great value because of his business experience.  As such, the Nominating/ Governance Committee has nominated Robert Sarverwas elected as a Class II director to serve as an additional non-independent member of the Board.

 

The Board has also determined that all governance Committeescommittees of the Board are composed entirely of independent directors.

 

The Board and Board Committees

 

We currently have nineeight incumbent directors and the following committees: Audit Committee, Executive Compensation Committee and Nominating/Governance Committee.

 

During 2004,2005, the Board of Directors held eighteleven meetings. Each director attended all of these meetings and the committee meetings of which he is a member, withexcept as follows:  Mr. Campbell was unable to attend one Board meeting and one Audit Committee meeting; Mr. Sarver was unable to attend two Board meetings; Mr. White (who resigned from the exception ofBoard in October 2005 after joining the Company as Executive Vice President – General Counsel and Secretary) was unable to attend one Board meeting; and Mr. Oppel whoBurke was unable to attend one Audit Committee meeting.  Mr. Burke attended all meetings and the committee meetings of which he is a member from the time he was appointed to the Board in September 2004.  Mr. Haddock joined the Board in January 2005. Directors are expected to attend the Meritage Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All directors attended our 20042005 annual meeting, which was held on May 12, 2004, with the exception of Mr. Burke and Mr. Haddock, who were not members at that time.11, 2005.

 

819



 

The following table summarizes the current members of our Board of Directors and describes the current members of each of the Committees and the number of meetings held during 2004. 2005.

 

Board of Directors

 

Audit Committee

 

Executive
Compensation
Committee

 

Nominating/Governance
Committee

 

 

Audit Committee

 

Executive
Compensation
Committee

 

Nominating/Governance
Committee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John R. Landon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven J. Hilton

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John R. Landon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peter L. Ax* +

 

X

**

X

 

X

**

 

 

X**

 

X

 

X

Robert G. Sarver

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raymond Oppel*

 

X

 

X

**

X

 

 

 

X

 

X **

 

X

William G. Campbell*

 

X

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

X **

C. Timothy White

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Richard T. Burke, Sr.*

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Gerald W. Haddock*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Meetings

 

12

 

5

 

6

 

 

11

 

7

 

2

 

 


* = Independent Director

 

X = Member

 

** = Chair

 

+ = Lead Independent Director

 

Audit Committee

 

The Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1934, and the rules and regulations of the NYSE. The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors:

 

                  in fulfilling its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements,

                  in determining the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,

                  in determining the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and

                  in evaluating the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm.

 

The Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint or replace the independent registered public accounting firm and approves all audit engagement fees and terms of all significant non-audit engagements with the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with the pre-approval policies set forth in our Audit Committee charter. The Audit Committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from, and receive appropriate funding from the Company for, outside legal, accounting or other advisors as it deems necessary to carry out its duties.

 

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter established by the Board. The charter is available on our website at www.meritagehomes.com and we will provide a print copy to any stockholder upon request. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is financially literate, knowledgeable and qualified to review our financial statements. The Board of Directors has designateddetermined that each of Peter Ax and William Campbell is an “audit committee financial expert.”  Information about Messrs. Ax’s and Campbell’s past business and educational experience is included in their biographies in this Proxy Statement under the caption “Director Information.”

 

The report of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement on page 20.34.

 

9



Executive Compensation Committee

 

The Board of Directors has established an Executive Compensation Committee in accordance with the NYSE’s rules and regulations. The Executive Compensation Committee regularly reports regularly to the Board of Directors and its responsibilities include:

 

                �� reviewing and approving goals and objectives relative to the compensation of our Co-CEOs, evaluating our Co-CEOs’ performance in light of these goals and approving the compensation of our Co-CEOs,

20



                  making recommendations to the Board of Directors with regard to non-CEO compensation plans and equity-based plans,awards, and

                  producing a report on executive compensation to be included in our annual Proxy Statement.

��

The Executive Compensation Committee operates under a written charter, which is available on our website at www.meritagehomes.com.  Wewww.meritagehomes.com and we will provide a print copy to any stockholder upon request. Each member of the Executive Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE. The report of the Executive Compensation Committee is included in this Proxy Statement at page 15.28.

 

Nominating/Governance Committee

 

The Board of Directors has established a Nominating/Governance Committee, which directly reports directly to the Board of Directors and is responsible for:

 

                  identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and recommending director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders,

                  developing and recommending Corporate Governance Principles and Practices applicable to the Company,

                  leading the Board of Directors in its annual review of the Board’s performance, and

                  recommending nominees for the Executive Compensation Committee and Audit Committee.

 

The Nominating/Governance Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm used to identify director candidates, including sole authority to approve the search firm’s fees and other retention terms. The Nominating/Governance Committee operates under a written charter, which is available on our website at www.meritagehomes.com.  Wewww.meritagehomes.com and we will provide a print copy to any stockholder upon request. Each member of the Nominating/Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE.

 

Director Nomination Process

 

Stockholder Nominees. The policy of the Nominating/Governance Committee is to consider properly submitted shareholderstockholder nominations for candidates for membership on the Board of Directors as described below. In evaluating such nominations, the Nominating/Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board and to address the membership qualifications and criteria described below. Any shareholderstockholder nominations proposed for consideration by the Nominating/Governance Committee shouldmust include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be submitted to:

 

Meritage Homes Corporation
8501 E. Princess Drive

17851 North 85th Street

Suite 290
300

Scottsdale, Arizona 85255

Attn:  Corporate Secretary

10



 

The Secretary will forward all nominations to the Nominating/Governance Committee. In addition, the Company’s bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for consideration at an annual shareholderstockholder meeting. For a description of the process for submitting such nominations, and the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting, please see “Stockholder Proposals” on page 2538 of this Proxy Statement.

 

Director Qualifications. The Nominating/Governance Committee will evaluate prospective nominees using the standards and qualifications set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles and Practices. Prospective nominees should have the highest professional and personal ethics and values, as well as broad experience at the policy-making level in business, government, education or public interest. They should be committed to enhancing stockholder value and should have sufficient time to devote to carrying out their duties and to provide insight based upon experience, talent, skill and expertise appropriate for the Board. Each prospective nominee must be willing and able to represent the interests of the stockholders of the Company.

21



 

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors. The Nominating/Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees to serve as directors. The Nominating/Governance Committee assesses the current composition of the Board of Directors, the balance of management and independent directors and the need for Audit Committee expertise in its evaluation of prospective nominees. In the event that vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Nominating/Governance Committee may seek recommendations from current Board members, professional search firms, outside legal, accounting and other advisors, or stockholders in order to locate qualified nominees. After completing its evaluation, the Nominating/Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the full Board of Directors as to the persons who should be nominated by the Board of Directors, and the Board will determine the nominees after considering such recommendations.

 

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

 

Our Corporate Governance Principles and Practices dictate that the non-management members of the Board of Directors will meet in executive session at least quarterly outside the presence of Directorsdirectors that are employees or officers of the Company. The non-management Directorsdirectors met in executive session severalseven times during 20042005 and early 2005.2006. Peter Ax is the Company’s Lead Independent Director and presides over these executive session meetings.

 

Code of Ethics

 

Meritage Homes Corporation is committed to conducting business consistent with the highest ethical and legal standards. The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics, which is applicable to all employees, including our Co-CEOs and our Chief Financial Officer. The Code is available on our website at www.meritagehomes.com and we will provide a print copy to any stockholder upon request.

 

Communications with the Board of Directors

 

Interested persons may communicate with the Board of Directors by writing to our Lead Independent Director at the address set forth on page 5.21.

 

1122



CONTINUING DIRECTOR INFORMATION

 

Meritage divides its Board of Directors into two classes, one of which is up for election this year, as set forth under “Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1).”  The following sets forth biographical information regarding each member of the class of directors whose term will continue until the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders.

John R. Landon, 48, has been co-chairman and co-chief executive officer of Meritage Homes Corporation since 1997. Mr. Landon founded Texas-based Legacy Homes in 1987, which became a part of Meritage in 1997. Prior to founding Legacy Homes, Mr. Landon’s experience included land acquisition and development operations for a large homebuilder, sales and land development for the Trammel Crow Residential Group and public accounting with Ernst & Whinney. Mr. Landon received his undergraduate degree in accounting from Louisiana State University.

Robert G. Sarver, 44, has been a director since December 1996, and is the chairman and chief executive officer of Western Alliance Bancorporation, a director of Skywest Airlines, and the managing partner of the Phoenix Suns basketball team. He was the chairman and chief executive officer of California Bank & Trust from 1998 to 2001. From 1995 to 1998, he served as chairman of Grossmont Bank. In 1990, Mr. Sarver co-founded and currently serves as the executive director of Southwest Value Partners and Affiliates, a real estate investment company. Mr. Sarver founded the National Bank of Arizona and was its President until its acquisition by Zions Bancorporation in 1994. Mr. Sarver has been a certified public accountant.

Peter L. Ax, 47, has been a director since September 2000 and is the managing partner of Phoenix Capital Management, an investment banking and merchant banking firm. Mr. Ax is the former chairman and chief executive officer of SpinCycle, Inc., a publicly held consolidator and developer of coin-operated Laundromats. Previously, Mr. Ax served as head of the Private Equity Division and senior vice president of Lehman Brothers in New York. Mr. Ax is also on the board of directors of CashX, Inc. and Medit Marketing, Inc. and serves on the Advisory Board of Directors of Cascadia Capital, a Seattle based investment banking and merchant banking firm. Mr. Ax holds an M.B.A. from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and a law degree from the University of Arizona, and has been a certified public accountant. He has also been an accounting instructor at the Wharton School.

Gerald W. Haddock, 58, was appointed as a director in January 2005. Mr. Haddock is the founder of Haddock Enterprises, LLC and formerly served as President and CEO of Crescent Real Estate Equities, a diversified real estate investment trust. He is currently a Director and Audit Committee Chairman of ENSCO International, Inc., a leading global offshore oil and gas drilling service company, and a director of Cano Petroleum, Inc., a Ft. Worth-based producer of crude oil and natural gas that specializes in enhanced recovery technology. He also serves on the Board of Directors of the Baylor Foundation of Baylor University, on the Dean’s Strategic Council for the Graduate Tax Program at New York University and on the Board of Trustees of the M.D. Anderson Proton Therapy Education and Research Foundation.

23



DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

Non-employee directors received receive an annual cash retainer of $42,336 in 2004,$50,000, plus expenses related to attending Board and Committee meetings.  Mr. Burke, who joined the Board in September, received $16,668 in 2004 director fees.  In 2005, our non-employee directors will receivemeetings, and an annual retainergrant of $50,000, plus expenses.stock options. Our Lead Independent Directorlead director receives $55,000 annually in addition to his annual retainer. Non-employee directors receive no additional cash compensation for attending Board or Committee meetings. In 2004 andThe following table summarizes the compensation we paid in 2005 eachto our non-employee director was granted options to acquire 10,000 (split-adjusted) and 5,000 shares of our common stock, respectively.directors.

Name

 

Fees earned or
paid in cash ($)

 

Option Awards (#)(1)(2)

 

Peter L. Ax

 

$

164,170

 

5,000

 

Robert G. Sarver(3)

 

$

50,000

 

5,000

 

Raymond Oppel

 

$

50,000

 

5,000

 

William G. Campbell

 

$

50,000

 

5,000

 

Richard T. Burke(3)

 

$

50,000

 

5,000

 

Gerald W. Haddock

 

$

50,000

 

10,000

 

C. Timothy White(4)

 

$

33,340

 

5,000

 


(1)          Non-employee director stock options vest in equal share increments on each of the first two anniversary dates of the date of grant and have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the grant date.date of grant.

 

(2)          As of December 31, 2005, the outstanding number of options held by the non-employee directors was 45,000, 85,000, 35,000, 17,500, 15,000 and 10,000 for Messrs. Ax, Sarver, Oppel, Campbell, Burke and Haddock, respectively.

(3)          As part of reimbursing directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings, we reimburse certain directors for charter aircraft service. During 2005, we made reimbursements of approximately $80,500 and $8,400, to Messrs. Burke and Sarver, respectively.

(4)          Effective October 1, 2005, Mr. White joined the Company as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and resigned his Board position shortly thereafter.

24



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The following table summarizes the compensation we paid in 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003 to our co-chief executive officersCo-CEOs and three other most highly compensated executive officers who were paid in excess of $100,000 in 2004.2005.

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLESummary Compensation Table

 

Annual Compensation

Annual Compensation

 

Long-Term
Compensation
Awards

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary
($)

 

Bonus($)

 

All Other
Compensation($) (5)

 

Securities Underlying
Options (#) (3)

 

 

Annual Compensation

 

 

 

Long-Term
Compensation Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name And Principal
Position

 

Year

 

Salary
($)

 

Bonus($)

 

All Other
Compensation($) (4)

 

Securities Underlying
Options (#) ((3)

 

John R. Landon - Co-

 

2005

 

$

925,000

 

$

8,608,808

 

$

180,403

 

50,000

 

Chairman and Co-Chief

 

2004

 

850,000

 

4,593,796

 

126,054

 

80,000

 

Executive Officer

 

2003

 

712,500

 

2,582,856

 

94,673

 

80,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven J. Hilton - Co-

 

2004

 

$

850,000

 

$

4,593,796

 

93,474

 

80,000

 

 

2005

 

$

925,000

 

$

8,608,808

 

$

133,555

 

50,000

 

Chairman and Co-Chief

 

2003

 

712,500

 

2,582,856

 

61,192

 

80,000

 

 

2004

 

850,000

 

4,593,796

 

93,474

 

80,000

 

Executive Officer

 

2002

 

425,000

 

1,935,043

 

23,026

 

80,000

 

 

2003

 

712,500

 

2,582,856

 

61,192

 

80,000

 

John R. Landon - Co-

 

2004

 

$

850,000

 

$

4,593,796

 

126,054

 

80,000

 

Chairman and Co-Chief

 

2003

 

712,500

 

2,582,856

 

94,673

 

80,000

 

Executive Officer

 

2002

 

425,000

 

1,935,043

 

58,575

 

80,000

 

Larry W. Seay - Chief

 

2004

 

$

275,625

 

$

1,113,648

 

35,421

 

30,000

 

Financial Officer, Vice

 

2003

 

262,019

 

786,784

(1)

20,144

 

30,000

 

President and Secretary

 

2002

 

224,678

 

600,130

(2)

12,937

 

30,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Larry W. Seay – Executive

 

2005

 

$

289,406

 

$

2,086,964

 

$

24,888

 

20,000

 

Vice President and Chief

 

2004

 

275,625

 

1,160,648

(1)

35,421

 

30,000

 

Financial Officer

 

2003

 

262,019

 

786,784

(2)

20,144

 

30,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C. Timothy White – Executive

 

2005

 

$

165,786

 

$

350,000

 

$

5,594

 

20,000

 

Vice President, General

 

2004

 

42,336

 

 

 

5,000

 

Counsel and Secretary (4)

 

2003

 

32,000

 

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Richard T. Morgan – Vice

 

2004

 

$

175,000

 

$

222,000

 

9,462

 

20,000

 

 

2005

 

$

200,000

 

$

200,000

 

$

10,059

 

12,500

 

President and Treasurer

 

2003

 

165,000

 

180,000

(1)

9,200

 

20,000

 

 

2004

 

175,000

 

222,000

(1)

9,462

 

20,000

 

 

2002

 

150,000

 

165,455

(2)

5,811

 

20,000

 

 

2003

 

165,000

 

180,000

(2)

9,200

 

20,000

 

 


(1)          Includes deferred compensation of $47,000 for each of Messrs. Seay and Morgan, payable in January 2008.

(2)Includes deferred compensation of $46,000 for each of Messrs. Seay and Morgan, payable in December 2006.

(2)January 2007.               Includes deferred compensation of $45,455 for each Messrs. Seay and Morgan, payable in December 2005.  Mr. Morgan also received an award of 152 shares of Meritage stock in 2002.

 

(3)          AdjustedThe amounts for 2003 and 2004 are adjusted to reflect a 2-for-1 stock split that occurred in January 2005.

 

(4)          Effective October 1, 2005, Mr. White joined the Company as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and resigned his Board position shortly thereafter. The amounts reflected for Mr. White for 2003 and 2004 represent annual retainer and stock option grants in connection with Mr. White’s service as a director of the Company. The amounts reflected for Mr. White for 2005 include $33,340 representing his 2005 director retainer and 5,000 director stock options.

(5)These amounts represent matching contributions by us to the officers’ accounts under the 401(k) plan, group medical, long-term disability and life insurance plan premiums and automobilevehicle and other allowances (including personal use of fractionally-owned company aircraft and third party charter aircraft services) paid by us as follows:

 

1225



 

Name

 

Year

 

401(k) Match

 

Group, Long-Term
Disability And Life
Insurance

 

Vehicle and Other
Travel Allowance

 

Total Other
Compensation

 

 

Year

 

401(k) Match

 

Group, Long-Term Disability And Life Insurance

 

Vehicle and Other Travel Allowance (1)

 

Total Other Compensation

 

John R. Landon

 

2005

 

$

5,040

 

$

54,089

 

$

121,274

 

$

180,403

 

 

2004

 

4,560

 

51,404

 

70,090

 

126,054

 

 

2003

 

3,125

 

74,445

 

17,103

 

94,673

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven J. Hilton

 

2004

 

$

4,920

 

$

36,109

 

$

52,445

 

$

93,474

 

 

2005

 

$

5,040

 

$

26,242

 

$

102,273

 

$

133,555

 

 

2003

 

3,553

 

25,595

 

32,044

 

61,192

 

 

2004

 

4,920

 

36,109

 

52,445

 

93,474

 

 

2002

 

3,278

 

18,735

 

1,013

 

23,026

 

John R. Landon

 

2004

 

4,560

 

51,404

 

70,090

 

126,054

 

 

2003

 

3,125

 

74,445

 

17,103

 

94,673

 

 

2003

 

3,553

 

25,595

 

32,044

 

61,192

 

 

2002

 

3,087

 

39,816

 

15,672

 

58,575

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Larry W. Seay

 

2004

 

4,920

 

15,340

 

15,161

 

35,421

 

 

2005

 

$

3,440

 

$

7,046

 

$

14,400

 

$

24,888

 

 

2003

 

3,408

 

4,436

 

12,300

 

20,144

 

 

2004

 

4,920

 

15,340

 

15,161

 

35,421

 

 

2002

 

3,300

 

3,637

 

6,000

 

12,937

 

 

2003

 

3,408

 

4,436

 

12,300

 

20,144

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C. Timothy White

 

2005

 

$

 

$

1,994

 

$

3,600

 

$

5,594

 

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Richard T. Morgan

 

2004

 

5,290

 

4,172

 

 

9,462

 

 

2005

 

$

5,040

 

$

5,019

 

$

 

$

10,059

 

 

2003

 

2,715

 

6,485

 

 

9,200

 

 

2004

 

5,290

 

4,172

 

 

9,462

 

 

2002

 

2,475

 

3,336

 

 

5,811

 

 

2003

 

2,715

 

6,485

 

 

9,200

 


(1)Includes personal use of fractionally-owned company aircraft and third party charter aircraft services valued at $103,144 and $61,758 for Messrs. Landon and Hilton, respectively. In addition, in 2003, 2004 and 2005, we chartered aircraft services from companies in which Messrs. Landon and Hilton have a significant ownership interest. The total amounts paid for the charter services were approximately $234,000, $246,000 and $202,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, on behalf of Mr. Hilton and $614,000, $0 and $0 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, on behalf of Mr. Landon. Other than the amounts reflected as compensation in the above table, these charter services are utilized for executive travel relating to official company business by Messrs. Landon, Hilton and other Company directors, executives and professional advisors.

 

OPTION GRANTS IN 2004Option Grants in 2005

 

The following table lists stock options granted in 20042005 to the officers named in the Summary Compensation Table above. The amounts shown as potential realizable values rely on arbitrarily assumed share price appreciation rates prescribed by the SEC over the fivefive- or seven-year term of the options. In assessing those values, please note that the ultimate value of the options depends on actual future share values. The values andset forth below do not necessarily reflect management’s assessment of our future stock price performance and are not intended to indicate our assessment of the value of the options.  Share amounts have been adjusted to reflect a 2-for-1 stock split that occurred in January 2005.

 

 

Individual Grants

 

Potential Realizable Value

 

 

Number Of

 

Percent of

 

 

 

 

 

At Assumed Annual Rates

 

 

Shares

 

Total Options

 

 

 

 

 

Of Stock Price

 

 

Individual Grants

 

Potential Realizable Value

 

 

Underlying

 

Granted to

 

Exercise Of

 

 

 

Appreciation

 

 

Number Of
Shares
Underlying
Options

 

Percent of
Total Options
Granted to Employees

 

Exercise Of
Base Price

 

Expiration

 

At Assumed Annual Rates
Of Stock Price
Appreciation
For Option Term

 

 

Options

 

Employees

 

Base Price

 

Expiration

 

For Option Term

 

Name

 

Granted (#)

 

In 2004

 

($/Sh)

 

Date

 

5% ($)

 

10% ($)

 

 

Granted (#)

 

In 2005

 

($/Sh)

 

Date

 

5% ($)

 

10% ($)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John R. Landon

 

50,000

 

9.0

%

58.62

 

3/22/12

 

1,193,211

 

2,780,690

 

Steven J. Hilton

 

80,000

 

9.1

%

31.31

 

5/12/11

 

1,019,705

 

2,376,347

 

 

50,000

 

9.0

%

58.62

 

3/22/12

 

1,193,211

 

2,780,690

 

John R. Landon

 

80,000

 

9.1

%

31.31

 

5/12/11

 

1,019,705

 

2,376,347

 

Larry W. Seay

 

30,000

 

3.4

%

31.31

 

5/12/11

 

382,389

 

891,130

 

 

20,000

 

3.6

%

58.62

 

3/22/12

 

477,285

 

1,112,276

 

C. Timothy White

 

5,000

 

n/a

 

58.62

 

3/22/12

 

119,321

 

278,069

 

C. Timothy White

 

15,000

 

2.7

%

74.30

 

8/28/12

 

453,713

 

1,057,345

 

Richard T. Morgan

 

20,000

 

2.3

%

31.31

 

5/12/11

 

254,926

 

594,087

 

 

10,000

 

1.8

%

58.62

 

3/22/12

 

238,642

 

556,138

 

Richard T. Morgan

 

2,500

 

0.5

%

61.28

 

4/10/12

 

62,368

 

145,343

 

 

No options were granted at a below marketbelow-market price in 2004,2005, and we do not have a stock appreciation rights program. The 5,000 share option grant to Mr. White was granted pursuant to his service as a director.

26



 

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN 2004
AND 2004 YEAR-END OPTION VALUESAggregated Option Exercises in 2005 and 2005 Year-End Option Values

 

The following table lists the number of shares acquired and the value realized as a result of options exercised during 20042005 for the listed officers. The table contains values for “in the money” options, which are those with a positive spread between the exercise price and the December 31, 20042005 share price of $56.35.$62.92. The values are the difference between the year-end price per share and the exercise price per share, multiplied by the number of applicable shares subject to options that are in the money. These values may never be realized. The options may never be exercised, and the value, if any, will depend on the share price on the exercise date.  Share amounts have been adjusted to reflect a 2-for-1 stock split that occurred in January 2005.

 

13



 

Shares
Acquired
On

 

Value

 

Number Of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
At December 31, 2004 (#)

 

Value of Unexercised In-
The-Money Options
At December 31, 2004 ($)

 

 

Shares
Acquired
On

 

Value

 

Number Of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
At December 31, 2005 (#)

 

Value of Unexercised In-
The-Money Options
At December 31, 2005 ($)

 

Name

 

Exercise (#)

 

Realized ($)

 

Exercisable

 

Unexercisable

 

Exercisable

 

Unexercisable

 

 

Exercise (#)

 

Realized ($)

 

Exercisable

 

Unexercisable

 

Exercisable

 

Unexercisable

 

John R. Landon

 

44,800

 

2,299,920

 

292,000

 

194,000

 

14,877,672

 

5,868,022

 

Steven J. Hilton

 

 

 

400,800

 

540,800

 

16,913,000

 

20,283,125

 

 

134,800

 

8,337,430

 

192,000

 

194,000

 

9,379,472

 

5,868,022

 

John R. Landon

 

56,710

 

1,572,625

 

420,800

 

540,800

 

17,985,000

 

20,283,125

 

Larry W. Seay

 

59,600

 

1,939,276

 

110,400

 

218,400

 

5,085,744

 

8,485,404

 

 

33,916

 

2,284,125

 

60,884

 

89,600

 

2,924,113

 

3,081,698

 

C. Timothy White

 

17,500

 

1,319,747

 

57,500

 

25,000

 

3,065,803

 

179,550

 

Richard T. Morgan

 

12,000

 

320,190

 

80,800

 

139,200

 

3,706,548

 

5,304,752

 

 

36,400

 

2,307,657

 

26,800

 

59,300

 

1,251,554

 

2,066,514

 

 

1427



 

REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

ON EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION

The following Report of the Executive Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report.

It is the duty of the Executive Compensation Committee to review and determine the salaries and bonuses of Meritage’s Co-CEOs, and to establish the general compensation policies for its executive officers. The Committee believes that the compensation programs for each Co-CEO and Meritage’s other executive officers should support the goals and values of the Company and reflect the Company’s performance and the value created for its stockholders, and that compensation programs should support the goals and values of the Company.  In addition, the Executive Compensation Committee administers Meritage’s Annual Incentive Plan.stockholders.

 

General Compensation Policy and Philosophy. The Company’sphilosophy is to provide its executive officers with compensation that is based on their individual performances, and the financial performance of Meritage.Meritage and the value of the Company’s stock. Compensation is generally comprised of:

 

                  a base salary,

                  performance bonuses designed to reward performance based onachievement of stated financial results,goals, and

                  stock-based incentives designed to tie the executive officer’s overall compensation to the interests of Meritage’s stockholders by providing rewards to executives if stockholders benefit from stock price appreciation.

 

The Executive Compensation Committee attempts to set executive compensation at levels that are competitive within the industry. The Company’s basic philosophy is to set salaries at the industry mediuma competitive level and provide forexecutives with the opportunity to earn bonuses at the 75th percentile if:

                  the financial goals set by the Board of Directors are met.  Each year we review executive compensation against publicly available information for other homebuilders.  The Committee has reviewed all components ofmet, and

                  the CEO’s pay and has found them to be in the aggregate reasonable and not excessive.  Company’s performance meets certain peer group parameters.

Periodically, we engage outside consultants to evaluate our compensation programs.programs and we perform internally prepared analyses of executive compensation as compared to publicly available information for other homebuilders. During 2002, the Executive Compensation Committee commissioned a global consulting firm to conduct a study of the Company’s executive compensation. Following this study, we entered into employment agreements with John R. Landon and Steven J. Hilton, Meritage’s Co-CEO’s. These employment agreements, which will expire at the end of this year (having been extended for one year), are described in the following section.  

 

In 2001,2006, the BoardExecutive Compensation Committee intends to reevaluate the compensation programs for our Co-CEOs and other senior executives, with the assistance of Directorsoutside consultants.

CEO Compensation. Meritage’s Co-CEOs, John R. Landon and stockholdersSteven J. Hilton, were compensated in 2005 pursuant to their employment agreements. These employment agreements provide for a base salary, a bonus based on company performance, stock options, and other customary executive benefits. A substantial portion of our Co-CEO’s compensation is performance-based, to align their goals and efforts with the interests of our stockholders.

Salary. Our Co-CEOs were each paid a base salary of $925,000 in 2005.

Options. Under their employment agreements, in 2005 our Co-CEOs were each granted options to acquire 40,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The Executive Compensation Committee approved additional option grants in 2005 to each Co-CEOs of 10,000 shares of our common stock. The exercise price was also the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.

Performance-Based Bonus. For 2005, the Executive Compensation Committee approved performance-based bonuses for each Co-CEO based on the parameters and formula reflected in their employment agreements and The

28



Meritage Homes Corporation Incentive Plan, which was adopted by the Board and approved by stockholders in 2001 (the “Annual Incentive“2001 Plan”). The Annual Incentive2001 Plan provides for annual incentive awards to certain of our key executives.executives subject to an aggregate maximum amount of $3,000,000 per executive. In determining awards to be made under the Annual Incentive2001 Plan, the Executive Compensation Committee may approve a formula that iscan design bonus programs based on one or more objective criteria, includinga variety of performance criteriacriteria.

For 2005, the Committee approved bonus award programs for each Co-CEO equal to:

                  .825% of EBITDA (before consideration of bonuses to certain executive officers and performance goals.  Performance criteria must include one or more ofone-time financing charges), provided that the following:  pre- or after-tax earnings, revenue growth, operating income, operating cash flow, return on net assets, return on stockholders’ equity,Company’s return on assets was in the top half of public homebuilders having revenues of $500 million or more, and

                  an additional .825% of EBITDA (before consideration of bonuses to certain executive officers and one-time financing charges) provided that the Company’s return on capital, share price growth, stockholder returns, gross or net profit margin, earnings per share, price per shareequity was in the top half of these builders.

During 2005, Meritage’s return on assets and market share, anyreturn on equity was in the top half of which may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase, or as compared to resultsour homebuilder peer group and each of a peer group.  It is our intent that awards made pursuant toCo-CEOs qualified for the Annual Incentive Plan constitutes “qualifiedmaximum performance-based compensation” satisfying the requirementplan bonus of Section 162(m)$3,000,000. In addition, because of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).factors outlined below, the Committee approved an additional discretionary bonus of $5,606,808 for each Co-CEO resulting in total performance-based bonuses for each Co-CEO of $8,606,808, as contemplated by the formulas set forth above.

Other Benefits. We also provided to our Co-CEOs other benefits consistent with our normal executive employment arrangements and our Co-CEOs’ existing employment agreements. These benefits are detailed in the Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy and in 2005 totaled less than $185,000 for each of our Co-CEOs.

 

Compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deductibility of executive compensation paid by publicly held corporations to $1 million for each executive officer named in this Proxy Statement. The $1 million limitation generally does not apply to compensation that is pursuant to a performance-based plan approved by stockholders. Our general policy is to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) and maintain deductibility for all executive compensation, exceptalthough we reserve the right, as do most public companies, to make non-deductible payments where we determine it is in circumstances where the best interests of Meritage and its stockholders.

During 2005, the discretionary component of the performance-based incentive compensation paid to our Co-CEOs did not qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code. The Executive Compensation Committee concludesconcluded that the payment of bonuses in addition to that provided under the 2001 Plan was fully justified, based on an informed basisa number of factors, including the following:

                  In 2005, Meritage set revenue, earnings and stock price records.

                  The Executive Compensation Committee surveyed executive compensation levels reported by other public homebuilders and determined that it isthe compensation paid to our Co-CEO’s was well within the range established by our competitors.

                  Since 2001, when the 2001 Plan cap was established, we have changed dramatically as a company including:

                  our revenues have increased from $744 million to over $3 billion,

                  our net earnings have increased from $51 million to $256 million and

                  our stock price has increased from $9.31 as of January 1, 2001 to $62.92 as of January 1, 2006.

The 2001 Plan has been replaced by the 2006 Plan described in Proposal No. 4, which plan includes a flexible cap that should facilitate the tax deductibility of bonuses in the foreseeable future.

Raymond Oppel – Chairman

Peter L. Ax

William G. Campbell

Gerald Haddock

 

1529



 

best interest of Meritage and our stockholders to take actions with regard to the payment of executive compensation which do not qualify for tax deductibility.

CEO Compensation.  Meritage’s two co-chief executive officers, John R. Landon and Steven J. Hilton, were compensated during 2004 pursuant to employment agreements they have with the Company.  Mr. Landon’s and Mr. Hilton’s employment agreements provide for a base salary, a bonus based on company performance and stock options.  Both agreements provide for an annual performance-based bonus.  In 2004, the objective performance criteria used to determine whether our Co-CEOs were entitled to a bonus was based on (i) the achievement of certain budget targets as set by the Executive Compensation Committee and (ii) Meritage’s return on assets and return on equity relative to other peer homebuilder companies.  The Executive Compensation Committee believes that tying compensation to financial performance aligns the interests of executives with those of our stockholders as determined by the Board of Directors.  These agreements expire in December 2005.

The performance bonus criteria in 2004 for each Mr. Landon and Mr. Hilton was based on meeting certain return on asset and return on equity goals.  Based on Meritage’s 2004 financial results, Messrs. Landon and Hilton each exceeded the minimum thresholds to qualify for a performance bonus.  As a result, the Executive Compensation Committee approved the following compensation for Messrs. Landon and Hilton:

an annualized salary of $850,000,

a performance bonus of $4,593,796, and

a grant of 80,000 stock options (split-adjusted) vesting over five years.

The Co-CEOs also participate in various other benefit plans generally available to all Meritage employees, including medical, 401(k) and life insurance plans.

During 2002, the Executive Compensation Committee commissioned a global consulting firm to conduct a study of the Company’s executive compensation.  As a result of this study, new employment agreements with John R. Landon and Steven J. Hilton, Meritage’s Co-CEOs, were approved and entered into in 2003.  These employment agreements, as well as the employment agreement with Larry W. Seay, are described in the following section.

Raymond Oppel – Chairman

Peter L. Ax

William G. Campbell

16



EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

Employment Agreements

 

In 2003, the Executive Compensation Committee approved employment agreements with John R. Landon and Steven J. Hilton, the Company’s Co-CEOs.

 

General Provisions. The new employment agreements were entered into in 2003 and were scheduled to expire on December 31, 2005 subjectbut were automatically extended to December 31, 2006 pursuant to a one-year renewal options.option. The agreements provide for an annual base salary of $850,000, increasing to $925,000$1,017,500 commencing January 1, 2005,2006, an annual performance-based bonus, stock options and other benefits.

 

Performance-Based Bonus.  OurSubject to approval by the stockholders of the 2006 Annual Incentive Plan, our Co-CEOs are entitled to a performance-based bonus if they meet or exceed certain defined performance criteria. The new employment agreements provide thatperformance-based criteria approved by the bonus is based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).  The objective performance criteria that will be used to determine whetherExecutive Compensation Committee for Messrs. Landon and Hilton are eligible for the performance period (fiscal 2006) is a bonus is based on Meritage’sequal to .825% of EBITDA (before consideration of bonuses to certain executive officers and one-time financing charges) if the Company’s return on assets is in the top half of public homebuilders having revenues of $500 million or more per year, and an additional .825% of EBITDA if the Company’s return on equity relativeis in the top half of these public builders. If either measurement falls within the 33% to other peer homebuilder companies (as determined in accordance49% percentile, the bonus shall be .5363% of EBITDA for the applicable measurement. If either measurement falls below the 33% threshold, then there will not be any formula bonus paid with the employment agreements).respect to such measurement.

 

Stock Options.The employment agreements provide for an annual grant to each Co-CEO of options to acquire 40,000 shares of Meritage common stock. The options vest over five years and the exercise price is equal to the fair market value on the date of grant, or if the options are incentive stock options, 110% of the fair market value of the date of grant.

 

Other Benefits. The agreements also entitle Mr. Landon and Mr. Hilton to participate in fringe and other benefits that are regularly provided by Meritage to its senior management, such as health and long-term disability insurance and paid vacation. In addition, the agreements provide Messrs. Landon and Hilton with:

 

                  payments to purchase additional life insurance coverage and disability insurance coverage,

                  a supplemental savings plan enabling deferred compensation in excess of current 401(k) limitations,

                  supplemental retirement benefits, and

                  charter aircraft services and the use of a Company car.

 

Non-Compete and Severance Provisions.The employment agreements contain non-compete provisions restricting Messrs. Landon and Hilton from engaging in the homebuilding and home sales business (subject to certain defined exceptions), hiring Meritage’s employees, and soliciting its customers and suppliers for a competing business or otherwise attempting to induce any customer or supplier to discontinue or materially modify its relationship with Meritage. The non-compete and non-solicitation provisions of Messrs. LandonLandon’s and Hilton’s employment agreementagreements continue for two years from their daterespective dates of termination.

 

If Mr. Landon or Mr. Hilton voluntarily terminates his employment with the Company for any reason or if the Company discharges him without cause, the Company will be obligated to pay:

 

                  $10 million, in equal monthly installments over a period of two years, which payment represents consideration for consulting, severance and non-competition, and

                  where the Company discharges him without cause during the last three months of the Company’s fiscal year, a pro rata bonus based on the Company’s performance for that fiscal year.

 

In addition, in the event the Company discharges either Mr. Landon or Mr. Hilton without cause, any options granted to him after July 1, 2003 shall vest in full.

 

1730



 

If Mr. LandonLandon’s or Mr. Hilton’s employment is terminated by the Company for cause, the Company will be obligated to pay his base salary through the date of termination, but no severance payment or other bonus will otherwise be payable.

 

Messrs. Landon and Hilton also have stock options that were granted prior to July 1, 2003 that include certain acceleration provisions. If the Company discharges Mr. Landon or Mr. Hilton without cause, or they resign for good reason, they may exercise any stock options granted prior to the new employment agreements to the extent already vested or to the extent they vest within three months of termination.

 

The Company also has an employment agreement with Larry W. Seay, its Chief Financial Officer, which willwas due to expire on December 31, 2005, subjectbut was automatically extended to December 31, 2006 pursuant to a one yearone-year renewal option. Mr. Seay’s agreement is designed to provideprovides for a base salary of approximately $303,877 and an annual bonus based on the achievement of specific performance objectives, which are similarobjectives. Subject to approval by the stockholders of the 2006 Annual Incentive Plan, Mr. Seay is entitled to a performance-based incentive bonus for the performance period (fiscal 2006) equal to .20% of EBITDA (before consideration of bonuses to certain executive officers and one-time financing charges) if the Company’s return on assets is in naturethe top half of public homebuilders having revenues of $500 million or more per year, and scopean additional .20% of EBITDA if the Company’s return on equity is in the top half of these public builders. If either measurement falls within the 33% to 49% percentile, the bonus shall be .13% of EBITDA for the applicable measurement. If either measurement falls below the 33% threshold, then there will not be any formula bonus paid with respect to such measurement. Mr. Seay will also receive an annual option grant to acquire 12,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the performance criteria appliedfair market value on the date of grant. In addition, Mr. Seay is entitled to our Co-Chief Executive Officers.a $1,200 per month automobile allowance. If Mr. Seay is terminated without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, he will be entitled to receive:

 

                  100% of his base salary and 100% of his average bonus for the previous two fiscal years, which payment represents consideration for consulting, severance and non-competition, and

                  where the Company discharges him without cause during the last three months of the Company’s fiscal year, a pro rata bonus based on the Company’s performance for that fiscal year.

 

If Mr. Seay’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or disability, the Company will pay a pro rated amount of his bonus for the year. In addition, upon such a termination, Mr. Seay’s options shall accelerate and become vested and he or his estate will have a period of one year to exercise such options. If Mr. Seay terminates his employment without good reason or the Company discharges him for cause, then the Company will be obligated to pay his base salary through the date of termination, but no severance payment or bonus will otherwise be payable. The non-compete provisions of Mr. Seay’s employment agreement last six months from his date of termination and the non-solicitation provisions last one year from his date of termination.

 

The Company also has an employment agreement with C. Timothy White, its Executive Vice President and General Counsel, which will expire on December 31, 2007, subject to automatic one year renewal options. The agreement provides for a base salary of $500,000 with an increase of 5% on January 1, 2007 and January 1 of any renewal term. Subject to approval by the stockholders of the 2006 Annual Incentive Plan, Mr. White is entitled to a performance based incentive compensation bonus for each of the next two performance periods (fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007) equal to .1125% of EBITDA (before consideration of bonuses to certain executive officers and one-time financing charges). Mr. White will also receive an annual option grant to acquire 15,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. In addition, Mr. White is entitled to a $1,200 per month automobile allowance and $3 million of term life insurance coverage.

31



If Mr. White resigns with good reason (as defined in the employment agreement) or is terminated without cause by the Company, he will be entitled to receive:

                  his base salary through the date of termination;

                  any unpaid bonus from the previous year plus a pro rated amount of his bonus during the year of termination;

                  a severance payment equal to 200% of his base salary and bonus for the previous fiscal year;

                  COBRA premiums for so long as COBRA is required to be offered to law; and

                  immediate vesting of all previously granted options.

The payment of the severance payment is conditioned on Mr. White agreeing to a six month non-compete agreement and a one year non-solicitation agreement.

If Mr. White voluntarily terminates his employment without good reason or is terminated for cause (as defined in the agreement) by the Company, he will be entitled to receive:

                  his base salary through the date of termination;

                  any unpaid bonus from the previous year plus a pro rated amount of his bonus during the year of termination; and

                  COBRA premiums for so long as COBRA is required to be offered to law.

CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTSChange of Control Arrangements

 

We have severance agreements with Messrs. Landon, Hilton, Seay, White and Morgan. Under these severance agreements, each of Messrs. Landon, Hilton and Seay areis entitled to a severance payment if his employment is terminated by us without cause within 90 days prior to, or within two years following, a change of control event. In the case of Mr. White, he is entitled to receive a severance payment if his employment is terminated by us without cause within 150 days prior to, or within two years following, a change of control. In the case of Mr. Morgan, he is entitled to receive a severance payment if his employment is terminated by us without cause within two years following a change of control event. In addition, the executive officer is entitled to the severance payment if he terminates his employment for good reason within two years following a change in control event. The severance payment equals the sum of:equals:

 

                  for Messrs. Landon and Hilton, the sum of (i) three times the higher of (x) his annual base salary on the date of termination of employment, or (y) his annual base salary on the date preceding the change of control and (ii) three times the highest of the following (i)(x) his average incentive compensation for the two years prior to the termination of his employment, (ii)(y) his incentive compensation for the year preceding the year in which the change of control occurred or (iii)(z) the incentive compensation he would have been entitled if the year were to end on the day on which the change of control occurs (based on performance up to that date),;

 

                  for Mr. Seay, the sum of (i) two times the higher of (x) his annual base salary on the date of termination of employment, or (y) his annual base salary on the date preceding the change of control and (ii) two times the highest of the following (i)(x) his average incentive compensation for the two years prior to the termination of his employment, (ii)(y) his incentive compensation for the year preceding the year in which the change of control occurred or (iii)(z) the incentive compensation he would have been entitled if the year were to end on the day on which the change of control occurs (based on performance up to that date), and;

 

18                  for Mr. White, the lesser of (i) two times his annual base salary and two times his bonus compensation on the date of termination (which is defined to equal the incentive compensation he would have been entitled if the year were to end on the day on which the change of control occurred, based on performance up to that date) or (ii) $2,500,000; and

                  for Mr. Morgan, the sum of (i) one times the higher of (x) his annual base salary on the date of termination of employment, or (y) his annual base salary on the date preceding the change of control and (ii) one times the

32



 

for Mr. Morgan, one times the average of the higher of (i)(x) his incentive compensation for the two years prior to the termination of his employment, or (ii)(y) his incentive compensation on the date preceding the change in control.

 

In addition, each executive will receive continuation of insurance benefits for a period of 24 months following termination of employment and immediate acceleration and vesting of all theirhis stock options.

 

1933



 

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

The following Report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report.

 

It is the duty of the Audit Committee to provide independent, objective oversight of Meritage’s accounting functions and internal controls. The Audit Committee is composed of independent directors as defined by the applicable SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. The Audit Committee acts under a written charter that sets forth the audit related functions the committee is to perform, a copy of which is located on our website at www. meritagehomes.com.www.meritagehomes.com. The audit functions of the Audit Committee are to:

 

                  serve as an independent and objective party to monitor Meritage’s financial reporting process and internal controls,

                  review and appraise the audit efforts of Meritage’s independent registered public accounting firm, and

                  provide an open avenue of communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, financial and senior management, and the Board of Directors.

The Audit Committee meets with management periodically to consider the adequacy of Meritage’s internal controls and the objectivity of its financial reporting. We discuss these matters with our independent registered public accounting firm and with appropriate company financial personnel. We regularly meet privately with the independent registered public accounting firm, which has unrestricted access to the Committee. We also recommend to the Board the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm and review periodically their performance and independence from management. We have considered the provision of additional services by our independent registered public accounting firm and believe that the provision of such additional services does not adversely impact their independence.

 

Although the Committee reviews Meritage’s financing plans and reports recommendations to the full Board for approval, management has primary responsibility for our financial statements and the overall reporting process, including the Company’s internal controls. The independent registered public accounting firm audits the annual consolidated financial statements prepared by management, expresses an opinion as to whether those consolidated financial statements fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Meritage in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and discusses with us any issues they believe should be raised with us.

 

We have reviewed Meritage’s audited consolidated financial statements and met with both management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, ourthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to discuss those consolidated financial statements. Management has represented to us that the consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have also reviewed, and discussed with management and Deloitte & Touche management'sLLP, management’s report and Deloitte & Touche'sTouche LLP’s report and attestation on internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We have received from and discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the written disclosure and the letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees). These items related to that firm’s independence from Meritage. We also discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP those matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communications with Audit Committees, as amended). Based on these reviews and discussions, we recommended to the Board that Meritage’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.2005.

Peter L. Ax - Chairman

Raymond Oppel

William G. Campbell

Richard T. Burke, Sr.

 

2034



 

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(Proposal No. 2)

The Board of Directors seeks an indication from stockholders of their approval or disapproval of the Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2005.

Deloitte & Touche LLP was appointed our auditor in 2004 and no relationship exists other than the usual relationship between auditors and clients.

If the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors for 2005 is not approved by stockholders, the adverse vote will be considered a direction to the Audit Committee to consider other auditors for next year.  However, because of the difficulty in making any substitution of auditors so long after the beginning of the current year, the appointment in 2005 will stand, unless the Audit Committee finds other good reason for making a change.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE

OF “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 2

21



PERFORMANCE GRAPH

 

The following Performance Graph does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this information.

 

The chart below graphs our performance in the form of cumulative total return to stockholders for the past five years. Our total return is compared to that of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, the S&P Small Cap 600 Index, which we are a member of, and the peer group reported in our last Proxy Statement.

 

The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 19992000 in Meritage common stock and in each of the other indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends.dividends.

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

1999

 

2000

 

2001

 

2002

 

2003

 

2004

 

 

2000

 

2001

 

2002

 

2003

 

2004

 

2005

 

Meritage Homes Corporation

 

$

100

 

$

342

 

$

471

 

$

619

 

$

1,219

 

$

2,072

 

 

$

100

 

$

138

 

$

181

 

$

356

 

$

605

 

$

676

 

Peer Group(1)

 

100

 

161

 

168

 

369

 

465

 

496

 

S&P 500

 

100

 

90

 

78

 

60

 

76

 

82

 

 

100

 

87

 

67

 

84

 

92

 

95

 

S&P Small Cap 600

 

100

 

111

 

117

 

99

 

137

 

166

 

 

100

 

106

 

90

 

123

 

150

 

160

 

Peer Group(1)

 

100

 

179

 

280

 

281

 

613

 

782

 

 

 


(1)          The Peer Group consists of the following companies:  Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., MDC Holdings, Inc., Ryland Group, Inc., Toll Brothers, Inc., Standard-PacificStandard Pacific Corporation, Technical Olympic USA, Inc., M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc., WCI Communities, Inc. and William Lyon Homes.

 

2235



 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

 

Executive officers, directors and “beneficial owners” of more than ten percent of our common stock must file initial reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Section 16(a).

 

SEC regulations require these reporting persons to furnish us with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5, and amendments thereto, that they file with the SEC. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms furnished to us, or representations that no forms were required, we believe that during 20042005 all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were complied with.

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

Since 1997, weWe have leased office space in Plano, Texas from a Texas partnership owned by John Landontransacted business with related or affiliated companies and his spouse.  The lease expires in May 2008.  Rents paid to the partnership were approximately $255,000 in 2004with certain officers and $242,000 in 2003.  Scheduled rent payments in 2005 are approximately $267,000.

We paid legal fees of approximately $783,000 in 2004 and $1,032,000 in 2003 to law firms of which C. Timothy White was a partner.

During 2004 and 2003, we chartered an aircraft from a company in which Steven J. Hilton has an ownership interest.  The total amounts paid for the charter service were approximately $246,000 and $202,000, respectively.

In 2004, we entered into a contract with a limited partnership to acquire a parcel of land in Tucson, Arizona.  The purchase pricedirectors of the land is approximately $4.6 million.  Robert G. Sarver is an officer of one of the parties of the selling entity, in which he has a 3.8% interest.  Also in 2004, we assigned our rights to purchase the first phase of this property with a purchase price of $1.7 million to another publicly-traded builder who closed on the property.  Subsequently, we purchased a portion of the first phase of the property for $2.6 million, which included various development costs relating to the property.  The Company anticipates it will acquire the remainder of this parcel of land over the next 3 years.

For several years we have had an advertising/sponsorship agreement with the National Basketball Association’s Phoenix Suns organization.  During 2004, Robert Sarver became the Controlling Owner and Vice Chairman of the Phoenix Suns, and Steven Hilton and John Landon became minority owners of the team.  In 2004 we paid approximately $250,000 in advertising/sponsorship costs related to the agreement.

One of our directors, Ray Oppel, has a 7.5% limited partnership interest in a joint venture that sells lots to Hammonds Homes, which arrangement was entered into prior to our acquisition of Hammonds.  Mr. Oppel earned approximately $36,600 in 2004 from this joint venture, in which his current investment is less than $40,000.  Mr. Oppel had also invested in various limited partnerships that entered into landbanking transactions with us.  Currently, Mr. Oppel has no limited partnership ownership percentage in these entities and he received no income from them in 2004.  By the end of 2001, Mr. Oppel had discontinued making new investments in landbanking transactions that involved sales to Meritage.

Management believesCompany. We believe that the terms and fees negotiated for all transactions listed abovebelow are no less favorable than those that could be negotiated in arm’s length transactions.

 

23Since 1997, we have leased office space in Plano, Texas from Home Financial Services, a Texas partnership owned by John Landon, our co-chief executive officer, and his wife. The lease expires in March 2009 and currently provides for an annual rent in 2006 of $254,553 and an annual escalator of 5% thereafter. Rents paid to the partnership were approximately $268,000, $255,000 and $242,000 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The office rent is included within general and administrative expenses on our consolidated statements of earnings.

We paid legal fees of approximately $1,643,000, $783,000 and $1,032,000 to law firms in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, of which C. Timothy White was a partner. Mr. White served on our board of directors until October 1, 2005, at which time he joined the Company as our General Counsel. Of these fees, approximately $1,136,000, $722,000 and $892,000 were real estate project related and capitalized to real estate on our balance sheet in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The remaining amounts are recorded within general and administrative expenses on our consolidated statements of earnings.

In 2004, we contracted with a landbanker to acquire property in the Tucson, Arizona area for $4.6 million. Robert Sarver, one of our directors, has a 3.8% ownership interest in the entity that sold this property to the landbanker. During 2005, we had purchases totaling approximately $1.2 million from the landbanker related to this property. In addition, we made purchases of approximately $64,800 directly from the entity in which Mr. Sarver has the ownership interest. We expect to complete the full acquisition of this property during fiscal 2007.

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Hancock Homes in 2001, the Company assumed an existing advertising/sponsorship agreement with the National Basketball Association’s Phoenix Suns organization. In 2004, one of our directors, Robert Sarver, became the managing partner of the Phoenix Suns, and our Co-CEOs, Steven Hilton and John Landon, became minority owners of the team. In 2005 and 2004, we paid approximately $392,000 and $250,000, respectively, in advertising/sponsorship costs related to the agreement. These amounts are recorded as general and administrative expenses on our consolidated statement of earnings.

During 2005, Richard T. Morgan, the Company’s Vice President and Treasurer, purchased from the Company a new home for $384,612. The purchase by Mr. Morgan was pursuant to Meritage’s home purchase program, which is generally available to all employees.

36



 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP serves as our principal independent registered public accounting firm. We expect representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP to be present at our Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions, and they will be given an opportunity to make a statement if they wish to.

 

The following table presents fees for professional accounting services rendered by our principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements for 20042005 and 2003,2004, and fees billed for other services rendered.

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Audit fees (1)

 

$

1,451,866

 

$

459,089

 

 

$

1,493,171

 

$

1,451,866

 

Audit related fees (2)

 

18,600

 

12,000

 

Audit and audit related fees

 

1,470,466

 

471,089

 

Audit-related fees (2)

 

71,475

 

18,600

 

Audit and audit-related fees

 

1,564,646

 

1,470,466

 

Tax fees (3)

 

201,797

 

528,491

 

 

83,350

 

201,797

 

Total fees

 

$

1,672,263

 

$

999,580

 

 

$

1,647,996

 

$

1,672,263

 

 


(1)          Audit fees consisted principally of fees for audit and review services, services related to various SEC filings and related research and the 20042005 and 20032004 senior note offerings. Audit fees in 2005 and 2004 include $775,741 and $907,843 of fees for audit services related to Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

 

(2)          Audit relatedAudit-related fees consisted of fees related to the audit of our 401(k) Plan.Plan and financial accounting and reporting consultations.

 

(3)          Tax fees consisted of fees for income tax consulting and tax (including state and local tax procurement) compliance, including preparation of original and amended state and federal income tax returns, refund claims, and IRS tax audit assistance.

 

Each year, the Audit Committee approves the annual audit engagement in advance. The Audit Committee also has established procedures to pre-approve all non-audit services provided by the principal independent registered public accounting firm. All 2005 and 2004 non-audit services listed above were pre-approved.

 

OnIn June 15, 2004, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Meritage Homes Corporation (the “Company”)the Company approved the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte & Touche”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004, and the dismissal of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. This action followed the decision by the Board of Directors of the Company on June 9, 2004, to accept the Audit Committee’s recommendation to change the Company’s auditors for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2004, effective upon selection of an alternative accounting firm, and to delegate to the audit committeeAudit Committee the responsibility of selecting the Company’s auditors for such period from the accounting firms recommended by the audit committeeAudit Committee to the Board of Directors.

 

KPMG’s audit reports on the Company’s financial statements for the two most recent fiscal years, whichyear ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that such reports contained an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill in 2002.

 

During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years which ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively, and the subsequent interim period through June 15, 2004:

 

(1)                  No reportable events (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K) occurred (except as noted below).

 

24



(2)                  The Company did not consult with Deloitte & Touche regarding any of the matters or events described in Item 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K, although we did discuss with Deloitte & Touche (and other firms we interviewed) a number of issues pertaining to their expertise in the homebuilding industry, including their experience in implementing FIN 46R. The Company did not, however, discuss any particular transaction or the type of audit report that they might issue on our financial statements.

 

37



During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years which ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively, and the subsequent interim period through June 15, 2004, the Company does not believe that there were any disagreements between the Company and KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to KPMG’s satisfaction, would have caused KPMG to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report. However, we note the following:

 

During the first part of 2004, the Company (including its Audit Committee) and KPMG discussed the implementation of the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “ConsolidationConsolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46R)Entities” (“FIN 46R”). The Company and KPMG had several discussions at varying levels within KPMG about its interpretations of FIN 46R.

 

In connection with the Company’s audit for the year ended December 31, 2003, KPMG confirmed to the Company’s Audit Committee, in writing, that there were no disagreements with management on financial accounting and reporting matters that, if not satisfactorily resolved, would have caused a modification of its report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, KPMG did not raise any disagreement with respect to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, which it reviewed in accordance with SAS 100.

 

On June 21, 2004, approximately one week after the Company terminated KPMG, KPMG advised the Company that, in its view, the termination of its services, and cessation of discussions over certain issues that were under discussion with the Company at the time, resulted in a reportable disagreement. Specifically, those issues pertain to information about entity formation, the absorbtionabsorption of expected losses and residual returns that a registrant must obtain in order to enable it to perform appropriate evaluations under FIN 46R. To date, the Company believes that it has implemented FIN 46R in accordance with KPMG’s interpretations.

 

The Company’s Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG the subject matter relating to the Company’s adoption and implementation of FIN 46R, including the informational requirements necessary to enable the Company to perform appropriate evaluations. The Company authorized KPMG to respond fully to the inquiries of Deloitte & Touche concerning all matters involving the Company, including our adoption and implementation of FIN 46R.

 

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

The Board of Directors and Nominating/Governance Committee will consider nominations from stockholders for the class of directors whose terms expire at the year 20062007 Annual Meeting. Nominations must be made in writing to our Secretary, received at least 90 days prior to the 20062007 Annual Meeting, and contain sufficient background information concerning the nominee’s qualifications. Our Corporate Secretary must receive any other stockholder proposals for the 20062007 Annual Meeting by December 12, 200515, 2006 to be considered for inclusion in our 20062007 Proxy Statement. Proposals to be presented at the 20062007 Annual Meeting that are not intended for inclusion in the Proxy Statement must be submitted in accordance with our Bylaws. A nomination or other proposal will be disregarded if it does not comply with the above procedures.

 

38



OTHER MATTERS

 

The Board of Directors is not aware of any other matters to be presented at the meeting. If any other business should properly come before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote according to their best judgment.discretion.

 

25



ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS

 

We are offering our stockholders the opportunity to consent to receiving our future proxy materials and annual reports electronically by providing the appropriate information when voting via the Internet. Electronic delivery could save us a significant portion of the costs associated with printing and mailing annual meeting materials, and we hope that our stockholders find this service convenient and useful. If you consent and Meritage elects to deliver future proxy materials and/or annual reports to you electronically, then we will send you a notice (either by electronic mail or regular mail) explaining how to access these materials but will not send you paper copies of these materials unless you request them. We may also choose to send one or more items to you in paper form despite your consent to receive them electronically. Your consent will be effective until you revoke it by terminating your registration at the website www.InvestorDelivery.com if you hold shares at a brokerage firm or bank participating in the ADP program, or by contacting Mellon Investor Services if you hold shares in your own name.

 

By consenting to electronic delivery, you are stating to Meritage that you currently have access to the Internet and expect to have access in the future. If you do not have access to the Internet, or do not expect to have access in the future, please do not consent to electronic delivery because we may rely on your consent and not deliver paper copies of future annual meeting materials. In addition, if you consent to electronic delivery, you will be responsible for your usual Internet charges (e.g., online fees) in connection with the electronic delivery of the proxy materials and annual report.

 

 

Meritage Homes Corporation

 

 

C. Timothy White

Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary

April 10, 2006

39



Appendix A

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHARTER

Article V(a) of the charter of the Corporation is hereby amended to read as follows:

“(a)  The total number of shares of stock of all classes which the Corporation has authority to issue is one hundred million (125,000,000) shares of capital stock, par value one cent ($0.01) per share, amounting in aggregate par value of One Million Two-Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,250,000). All of the authorized shares are classified as Common Stock of the same class (“Common Stock”).”



Appendix B

MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION

2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

EFFECTIVE DATE:  MAY 17, 2006

APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS:  MAY 17, 2006

TERMINATION DATE:  MAY 16, 2016

ARTICLE 1
PURPOSE

1.1GENERAL.   The purpose of the Meritage Homes Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to promote the success and enhance the value of Meritage Homes Corporation (the “Company”) by linking the personal interests of the members of the Board, employees, officers, executives, consultants and advisors to those of Company stockholders and by providing such individuals with an incentive for outstanding performance to generate superior returns to Company stockholders. The Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of Board members, employees, officers, executives, consultants and advisors upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful conduct of the Company’s operation is largely dependent.

ARTICLE 2
EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATE

2.1EFFECTIVE DATE.   The Plan is effective as of the date the Plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders (the “Effective Date”).

2.2EXPIRATION DATE.   The Plan will expire on, and no Award may be granted under the Plan after, the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date. Any Awards that are outstanding on the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date shall remain in force according to the terms of the Plan and the Award Agreement.

ARTICLE 3
DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION

3.1DEFINITIONS.   The following words and phrases shall have the following meanings:

(a)                                  “Award” means any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award, Performance Share Award, or Performance-Based Award granted to a Participant under the Plan.

(b)                                 “Award Agreement” means any written agreement, contract, or other instrument or document evidencing an Award.

(c)                                  “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(d)                                 “Cause” means and will exist in the following circumstances in which the Participant:  (i) is convicted of a felony, (ii) engages in any fraudulent or other dishonest act to the detriment of the Company, (iii) fails to report for work on a regular basis, except for periods of authorized absence or bona fide illness, (iv) misappropriates trade secrets, customer lists, or other



proprietary information belonging to the Company for his or her own benefit or for the benefit of a competitor, (v) engages in any willful misconduct designed to harm the Company or its stockholders, or (vi) fails to perform properly his or her assigned duties.

(e)                                  “Change of Control” means and includes each of the following:

(1)                                  A sale, transfer, or other disposition by the Company through a single transaction or a series of transactions of securities of the Company representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities to any “Unrelated Person” or “Unrelated Persons” acting in concert with one another. For purposes of this definition, the term “Person” shall mean and include any individual, partnership, joint venture, association, trust, corporation, or other entity (including a “group” as referred to in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act). For purposes of this definition, the term “Unrelated Person” shall mean and include any Person other than the Company, or an employee benefit plan of the Company; or

(2)                                  A sale, transfer, or other disposition through a single transaction or a series of related transactions of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to an Unrelated Person or Unrelated Persons acting in concert with one another; or

(3)                                  Any consolidation or merger of the Company with or into an Unrelated Person, unless immediately after the consolidation or merger the holders of the common stock of the Company immediately prior to the consolidation or merger are the beneficial owners of securities of the surviving corporation representing at least 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving corporation’s then outstanding securities.

(f)                                    “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

(g)                                 “Committee” means the committee of the Board described in Section 4.1.

(h)                                 “Covered Employee” means an employee who is, or could be, a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.

(i)                                     “Disabilitymeans, for purposes of this Plan, that the Participant qualifies to receive long term disability payments under the Company’s long term disability insurance program, as it may be amended from time to time.

(j)                                     “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(k)                                  “Fair Market Value” means, as of any given date, the fair market value of Stock on a particular date determined by such methods or procedures as may be established from time to time by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the Fair Market Value of Stock as of any date shall be the closing price for the Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange (or on any national securities exchange on which the Stock is then listed) for that date or, if no such prices are reported for that date, the average of the high and low trading prices on the next preceding date for which such prices were reported.

(l)                                     “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option that is intended to meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or any successor provision thereto.

2



(m)                               “Non-Employee Director” means a member of the Board who qualifies as a “Non-Employee Director” as defined in Rule 16b-3(b)(3) of the Exchange Act, or any successor definition adopted by the Board.

(n)                                 “Non-Qualified Stock Option” means an Option that is not intended to be an Incentive Stock Option.

(o)                                 “Option” means a right granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 7 of the Plan to purchase Stock at a specified price during specified time periods. An Option may be either an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option.

(p)                                 “Participant” means a person who, as a member of the Board, employee, officer, or executive of, or consultant or advisor to, the Company or any Subsidiary, has been granted an Award pursuant to the Plan.

(q)                                 “Performance-Based Awards” means the Performance Share Awards and Restricted Stock Awards granted to select Covered Employees pursuant to Articles 9 and 10, respectively, but which are subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Article 11. All Performance-Based Awards are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code.

(r)                                    “Performance Criteria” means the criteria that the Committee selects for purposes of establishing the Performance Goal or Performance Goals for a Participant for a Performance Period. The Performance Criteria that will be used to establish Performance Goals are limited to the following:  pre- or after-tax net earnings, earnings before interest expense (including interest amortized to cost of sales) and income taxes (“EBIT”), earnings before interest expense (including interest amortized to cost of sales), income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), revenue growth, operating income, operating cash flow, return on net assets, return on shareholders’ equity, return on assets, return on capital, share price growth, shareholder returns, gross or net profit margin, earnings per share, price per share, and market share, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or as compared to results of a peer group. The Committee shall, within the time prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code, define in an objective fashion the manner of calculating the Performance Criteria it selects to use for such Performance Period for such Participant.

(s)                                  “Performance Goals” means, for a Performance Period, the goals established in writing by the Committee for the Performance Period based upon the Performance Criteria. Depending on the Performance Criteria used to establish such Performance Goals, the Performance Goals may be expressed in terms of overall Company performance or the performance of a division, business unit, or an individual. The Committee, in its discretion, may, within the time prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code, adjust or modify the calculation of Performance Goals for such Performance Period in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants (i) in the event of, or in anticipation of, any unusual or extraordinary corporate item, transaction, event, or development, or (ii) in recognition of, or in anticipation of, any other unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company, or the financial statements of the Company, or in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, or business conditions.

(t)                                    “Performance Period” means the one or more periods of time, which may be of varying and overlapping durations, as the Committee may select, over which the attainment of one or more Performance Goals will be measured for the purpose of determining a Participant’s right to, and the payment of, a Performance-Based Award.

3



(u)                                 “Performance Share Award” means a right granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 9, to receive cash, Stock, or other Awards, the payment of which is contingent upon achieving certain performance goals established by the Committee.

(v)                                 “Plan” means this Meritage Homes Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended.

(w)                               “Restricted Stock Award” means Stock granted to a Participant pursuant to Article 10 that is subject to certain restrictions and to risk of forfeiture.

(x)                                   “Stock” means the common stock of the Company and such other securities of the Company that may be substituted for Stock pursuant to Article 13.

(y)                                 “Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means a right granted to a Participant under Article 8 to receive the appreciation on Stock.

(z)                                   “Subsidiary” means any corporation or other entity of which a majority of the outstanding voting stock or voting power is beneficially owned directly or indirectly by the Company.

ARTICLE 4
ADMINISTRATION

4.1COMMITTEE.   The Plan shall be administered by the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board. The Committee (or subcommittee thereof) shall consist of at least two individuals, each of whom qualifies as (i) a Non-Employee Director, and (ii) an “outside director” pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations issued thereunder.

4.2ACTION BY THE COMMITTEE.   A majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum. The acts of a majority of the members present at any meeting at which a quorum is present, and acts approved in writing by a majority of the Committee in lieu of a meeting, shall be deemed the acts of the Committee. Each member of the Committee is entitled to, in good faith, rely or act upon any report or other information furnished to that member by any officer or other employee of the Company or any Subsidiary, the Company’s independent registered public accountants, or any executive compensation consultant or other professional retained by the Company to assist in the administration of the Plan.

4.3AUTHORITY OF COMMITTEE.   Subject to any specific designation in the Plan, the Committee has the exclusive power, authority and discretion to:

(a)                                  designate Participants to receive Awards;

(b)                                 determine the type or types of Awards to be granted to each Participant;

(c)                                  determine the number of Awards to be granted and the number of shares of Stock to which an Award will relate;

(d)                                 determine the terms and conditions of any Award granted pursuant to the Plan, including, but not limited to, the exercise price, grant price, or purchase price, any restrictions or limitations on the Award, any schedule for lapse of forfeiture restrictions or restrictions on the exercisability of an Award, and accelerations or waivers thereof, based in each case on such considerations as the Committee in its sole discretion determines; provided, however, that the Committee

4



shall not (i) have the authority to accelerate the vesting or waive the forfeiture of any Performance-Based Awards, or (ii) take any action or fail to take any action with respect to the operation of the Plan that would cause all or part of the payment under any Award to be subject to the additional tax under Section 409A of the Code;

(e)                                  determine whether, to what extent, and pursuant to what circumstances an Award may be settled in, or the exercise price of an Award may be paid in, cash, Stock, other Awards, or other property, or an Award may be canceled, forfeited, or surrendered;

(f)                                    prescribe the form of each Award Agreement, which need not be identical for each Participant;

(g)                                 decide all other matters that must be determined in connection with an Award;

(h)                                 establish, adopt, or revise any rules and regulations as it may deem necessary or advisable to administer the Plan;

(i)                                     interpret the terms of, and any matter arising pursuant to, the Plan or any Award Agreement; and

(j)                                     make all other decisions and determinations that may be required pursuant to the Plan or as the Committee deems necessary or advisable to administer the Plan.

4.4DECISIONS BINDING.   The Committee’s interpretation of the Plan, any Awards granted pursuant to the Plan, any Award Agreement and all decisions and determinations by the Committee with respect to the Plan are final, binding, and conclusive on all parties.

ARTICLE 5
SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN

5.1NUMBER OF SHARES.   Subject to adjustment provided in Article 13, the aggregate number of shares of Stock reserved and available for grant pursuant to the Plan shall be 700,000, plus (i) the number of shares of Stock available for grant pursuant to the Meritage Homes Corporation Stock Option Plan (“Prior Plan”) as of the Effective Date, and (ii) the number of shares of Stock that were previously granted pursuant to the Prior Plan and that either terminate, expire, or lapse for any reason after the Effective Date. Any shares of Stock issued in connection with Awards other than Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall be counted against the shares available for grant pursuant to the previous sentence as 1.38 shares for every one share issued in connection with such Award or by which the Award is valued by reference. Notwithstanding the above, the maximum number of shares of Stock that may be awarded as Incentive Stock Options under the Plan is 1,200,000.

5.2LAPSED OR ASSUMED AWARDS.   To the extent that an Award terminates, expires, or lapses for any reason, any shares of Stock subject to the Award will again be available for the grant of an Award pursuant to the Plan. Additionally, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law or any securities exchange rule, shares of Stock issued in assumption of, or in substitution for, any outstanding awards of any entity acquired in any form of combination by the Company or any Subsidiary shall not be counted against shares of Stock available for grant pursuant to this Plan. However, for avoidance of doubt, the exercise of a stock-settled SAR or net-cashless exercise of an Option (or a portion thereof) will reduce the number of shares of Stock available for issuance hereunder by the entire number of shares of Stock subject to that SAR or Option (or applicable portion thereof), even though a smaller number of

5



shares of Stock will be issued upon such an exercise. Also, shares of Stock tendered to pay the exercise price of an Option or to satisfy a tax withholding obligation arising in connection with an Award will not become available for grant or sale under the Plan.

5.3STOCK DISTRIBUTED.   Any Stock distributed pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Stock, treasury Stock or Stock purchased on the open market.

5.4LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF SHARES SUBJECT TO AWARDS.   Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, and subject to the adjustment in Article 13, the maximum number of shares (counted, as described in Section 5.1 above, as 1.38 shares awarded for every one share issued in connection with such Award or by which the Award is valued by reference) of Stock with respect to one or more Awards that may be granted to any one Participant during a calendar shall be 100,000.

ARTICLE 6
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION

6.1ELIGIBILITY.

(a)General.   Persons eligible to participate in this Plan include all members of the Board, employees, officers, and executives of, and consultants and advisors providing services to, the Company or a Subsidiary, as determined by the Committee.

(b)Foreign Participants.   In order to assure the viability of Awards granted to Participants employed in foreign countries, the Committee may provide for such special terms as it may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, tax policy, or custom. Moreover, the Committee may approve such supplements to, or amendments, restatements, or alternative versions of, the Plan as it may consider necessary or appropriate for such purposes without thereby affecting the terms of the Plan as in effect for any other purpose; provided, however, that no such supplements, amendments, restatements, or alternative versions shall increase the share limitations contained in Article 5 of the Plan.

6.2ACTUAL PARTICIPATION.   Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee may, from time to time, select from among all eligible individuals, those to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine the nature and amount of each Award. No individual shall have any right to be granted an Award pursuant to this Plan.

6



ARTICLE 7
STOCK OPTIONS

7.1GENERAL.   The Committee is authorized to grant Options to Participants on the following terms and conditions:

(a)Exercise Price.   The exercise price per share of Stock pursuant to an Option shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement; provided that the exercise price for any Option shall not be less than the Fair Market Value as of the date of grant.

(b)Time and Conditions of Exercise.   The Committee shall determine the time or times at which an Option may be exercised in whole or in part provided that the term of any Option granted under the Plan shall not exceed ten years. The Committee shall also determine the performance or other conditions, if any, that must be satisfied before all or part of an Option may be exercised. Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, an Option will lapse immediately if a Participant’s employment is terminated for Cause.

(c)Payment.   The Committee shall determine the methods by which the exercise price of an Option may be paid, the form of payment, including, without limitation, cash, promissory note, shares of Stock held for longer than six months (through actual tender or by attestation), or other property acceptable to the Committee (including broker-assisted “cashless exercise” arrangements), and the methods by which shares of Stock shall be delivered or deemed to be delivered to Participants.

(d)Evidence of Grant.   All Options shall be evidenced by a written Award Agreement between the Company and the Participant in the form attached to this Plan as Exhibit A. The Award Agreement shall include such additional provisions as may be specified by the Committee.

7.2INCENTIVE STOCK OPTIONS.   Incentive Stock Options shall be granted only to employees and the terms of any Incentive Stock Options granted pursuant to the Plan must comply with the following additional provisions of this Section 7.2:

(a)Exercise Price.   Subject to Section 7.2(d), the exercise price per share of Stock shall be set by the Committee, provided that the exercise price for any Incentive Stock Option may not be less than the Fair Market Value as of the date of the grant.

(b)Exercise.   In no event, may any Incentive Stock Option be exercisable for more than ten years from the date of its grant.

(c)Lapse of Option.   An Incentive Stock Option shall lapse pursuant to the following circumstances.

(1)                                  The Incentive Stock Option shall lapse ten years from the date it is granted, unless an earlier time is set in the Award Agreement.

(2)                                  The Incentive Stock Option shall lapse upon termination of employment for Cause or for any other reason other than the Participant’s death or Disability, unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement.

(3)                                  If the Participant terminates employment on account of Disability or death before the Option lapses pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) above, the Incentive Stock Option shall

7



lapse, unless it is previously exercised, on the earlier of (i) the scheduled termination date of the Option; or (ii) 12 months after the date of the Participant’s termination of employment on account of Disability or death. Upon the Participant’s Disability or death, any Incentive Stock Options exercisable at the Participant’s Disability or death may be exercised by the Participant’s legal representative or representatives, by the person or persons entitled to do so pursuant to the Participant’s last will and testament, or, if the Participant fails to make testamentary disposition of such Incentive Stock Option or dies intestate, by the person or persons entitled to receive the Incentive Stock Option pursuant to the applicable laws of descent and distribution.

(d)Individual Dollar Limitation.   The aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the time an Award is made) of all shares of Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are first exercisable by a Participant in any calendar year may not exceed $100,000.00 or such other limitation as imposed by Section 422(d) of the Code, or any successor provision. To the extent that Incentive Stock Options are first exercisable by a Participant in excess of such limitation, the excess shall be considered Non-Qualified Stock Options.

(e)Ten Percent Owners.   An Incentive Stock Option shall be granted to any individual who, at the date of grant, owns stock possessing more than ten percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of Stock of the Company only if such Option is granted at a price that is not less than 110% of Fair Market Value on the date of grant and the Option is exercisable for no more than five years from the date of grant.

(f)Expiration of Incentive Stock Options.   No Award of an Incentive Stock Option may be made pursuant to this Plan after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date.

(g)Right to Exercise.   Except as provided in Section 12.5, during a Participant’s lifetime, an Incentive Stock Option may be exercised only by the Participant.

ARTICLE 8
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

8.1Grant Of SARs.   The Committee is authorized to grant SARs to Participants on the following terms and conditions:

(a)Right to Payment.   Upon the exercise of a SAR, the Participant to whom it is granted has the right to receive the excess, if any, of:

(1)                                  the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of exercise; over

(2)                                  the grant price of the SAR as determined by the Committee, which shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of grant.

(b)Other Terms.   All SARs grants will be evidenced by an Award Agreement. The terms, methods of exercise, methods of settlement, and any other terms and conditions of any SAR will be determined by the Committee at the time of the grant of the Award and as set forth in the Award Agreement; provided that the form of consideration payable in settlement of a SAR shall be Stock.

8



ARTICLE 9
PERFORMANCE SHARES

9.1GRANT OF PERFORMANCE SHARES.   The Committee is authorized to grant Performance Shares to Participants on such terms and conditions as may be selected by the Committee. The Committee shall have the complete discretion to determine the number of Performance Shares granted to each Participant. All Awards of Performance Shares shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement.

9.2RIGHT TO PAYMENT.   A grant of Performance Shares gives the Participant rights, valued as determined by the Committee, and payable to, or exercisable by, the Participant to whom the Performance Shares are granted, in whole or in part, as the Committee shall establish at grant or thereafter. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee shall set performance goals and other terms or conditions to payment of the Performance Shares in its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the number and value of Performance Shares that will be paid to the Participant.

9.3OTHER TERMS.   Performance Shares may be payable in cash, Stock, or other property, and have such other terms and conditions as determined by the Committee and reflected in a written Performance Share Award Agreement. Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, Performance Shares will lapse immediately if a Participant’s employment is terminated for Cause.

ARTICLE 10
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS

10.1GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK.   The Committee is authorized to make Awards of Restricted Stock to Participants in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as determined by the Committee. All Awards of Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by a written Restricted Stock Award Agreement.

10.2ISSUANCE AND RESTRICTIONS.   Restricted Stock shall be subject to such restrictions on transferability and other restrictions as the Committee may impose (including, without limitation, limitations on the right to vote Restricted Stock or the right to receive dividends on the Restricted Stock). These restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, pursuant to such circumstances, in such installments, or otherwise, as the Committee determines at the time of the grant of the Award or thereafter.

10.3FORFEITURE.   Except as otherwise determined by the Committee at the time of the grant of the Award or thereafter, upon termination of employment during the applicable restriction period, Restricted Stock that is at that time subject to restrictions shall be forfeited; provided, however, that the Committee may provide in any Restricted Stock Award Agreement that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to Restricted Stock will be waived in whole or in part in the event of terminations resulting from specified causes, and the Committee may in other cases waive in whole or in part restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to Restricted Stock. Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, Restricted Stock will be forfeited immediately if a Participant’s employment is terminated for Cause.

10.4CERTIFICATES FOR RESTRICTED STOCK.   Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Committee shall determine. If certificates representing shares of Restricted Stock are registered in the name of the Participant, certificates must bear an

9



appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock, and the Company may, at its discretion, retain physical possession of the certificate until such time as all applicable restrictions lapse.

ARTICLE 11
PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS

11.1PURPOSE.   The purpose of this Article 11 is to provide the Committee the ability to qualify the Performance Share Awards pursuant to Article 9 and the Restricted Stock Awards pursuant to Article 10 as “performance-based compensation” pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code. If the Committee, in its discretion, decides to grant a Performance-Based Award to a Covered Employee, the provisions of this Article 11 shall control over any contrary provision contained in Articles 9 or 10.

11.2APPLICABILITY.   This Article 11 shall apply only to those Covered Employees selected by the Committee to receive Performance-Based Awards. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Restricted Stock Awards or Performance Share Awards to Covered Employees that do not satisfy the requirements of this Article 11. The designation of a Covered Employee as a Participant for a Performance Period shall not in any manner entitle the Participant to receive an Award for the period. Moreover, designation of a Covered Employee as a Participant for a particular Performance Period shall not require designation of such Covered Employee as a Participant in any subsequent Performance Period and designation of one Covered Employee as a Participant shall not require designation of any other Covered Employees as a Participant in such period or in any other period.

11.3DISCRETION OF COMMITTEE WITH RESPECT TO PERFORMANCE AWARDS.   With regard to a particular Performance Period, the Committee shall have full discretion to select the length of such Performance Period, the type of Performance-Based Awards to be issued, the kind and/or level of the Performance Goal, and whether the Performance Goal is to apply to the Company, a Subsidiary or any division or business unit thereof. Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, Performance-Based Awards will be forfeited if a Participant’s employment is terminated for Cause.

11.4PAYMENT OF PERFORMANCE AWARDS.   Unless otherwise provided in the relevant Award Agreement, a Participant must be employed by the Company or a Subsidiary on the day a Performance Award for such Performance Period is paid to the Participant. Furthermore, a Participant shall be eligible to receive payment pursuant to a Performance-Based Award for a Performance Period only if the Performance Goals for such period are achieved. In determining the actual size of an individual Performance-Based Award, the Committee may reduce or eliminate the amount of the Performance-Based Award earned for the Performance Period, if in its sole and absolute discretion, such reduction or elimination is appropriate.

11.5MAXIMUM AWARD PAYABLE.   The maximum Performance-Based Award payable to any one Participant pursuant to the Plan for a Performance Period is 100,000 shares (counted, as described in Section 5.1 above, as 1.38 shares awarded for every one share issued in connection with such Award or by which the Award is valued by reference) of Stock.

ARTICLE 12
PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO AWARDS

12.1STAND-ALONE AND TANDEM AWARDS.   Awards granted pursuant to the Plan may, in the discretion of the Committee, be granted either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with, any

10



other Award granted pursuant to the Plan. Awards granted in addition to or in tandem with other Awards may be granted either at the same time as or at a different time from the grant of such other Awards.

12.2TERM OF AWARD.   The term of each Award shall be for the period as determined by the Committee, provided that in no event shall the term of any Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted in tandem with the Incentive Stock Option exceed a period of ten years from the date of its grant.

12.3FORM OF PAYMENT FOR AWARDS.   Subject to the terms of the Plan and any applicable law or Award Agreement, payments or transfers to be made by the Company or a Subsidiary on the grant or exercise of an Award may be made in such forms as the Committee determines at or after the time of grant, including, without limitation, cash, promissory note, Stock held for more than six months, other Awards, or other property, or any combination, and may be made in a single payment or transfer, in installments, or on a deferred basis, in each case determined in accordance with rules adopted by, and at the discretion of, the Committee.

12.4LIMITS ON TRANSFER.

(a)General.   Except as provided in Section 12.4(b) or Section 12.5, no right or interest of a Participant in any Award may be pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to, or in favor of, any party other than the Company or a Subsidiary, or shall be subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of such Participant to any other party other than the Company or a Subsidiary. Except as provided in Section 12.4(b) or Section 12.5, and except as otherwise provided by the Committee, no Award shall be assigned, transferred, or otherwise disposed of by a Participant other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

(b)Transfers to Family Members.   The Committee shall have the authority, in its discretion, to grant (or to sanction by way of amendment to an existing Award) Awards which may be transferred by the Participant during his or her lifetime to any Family Member (as defined below). Unless transfers for the Participant have been previously approved by the Committee, a transfer of an Award pursuant hereto may only be affected by the Company at the written request of the Participant. In the event an Award is transferred as contemplated herein, such transferred Award may not be subsequently transferred by the transferee (other than another transfer meeting the conditions herein) except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. A transferred Award shall continue to be governed by and subject to the terms and limitations of the Plan and relevant Award Agreement, and the transferee shall be entitled to the same rights as the Participant, as if the transfer had not taken place. For purposes of this Section 12.4(b), the term “Family Member” means spouse and any parent, stepparent, grandparent, child, stepchild, or grandchild, including adoptive relationships or a trust or any other entity in which these persons (or the Participant) have more than 50% of the beneficial interest.

12.5BENEFICIARIES.   Notwithstanding Section 12.4, a Participant may, in the manner determined by the Committee, designate a beneficiary to exercise the rights of the Participant and to receive any distribution with respect to any Award upon the Participant’s death. A beneficiary, legal guardian, legal representative, or other person claiming any rights pursuant to the Plan is subject to all terms and conditions of the Plan and any Award Agreement applicable to the Participant, except to the extent the Plan and Award Agreement otherwise provide, and to any additional restrictions deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee. If the Participant is married and resides in a community property state, a designation of a person other than the Participant’s spouse as his beneficiary with respect to more than 50% of the Participant’s interest in the Award shall not be effective without the prior written consent of the Participant’s spouse. If no beneficiary has been designated or survives the Participant, payment shall be made to the person entitled thereto pursuant to the Participant’s will or the

11



laws of descent and distribution. Subject to the foregoing, a beneficiary designation may be changed or revoked by a Participant at any time provided the change or revocation is provided to the Committee.

12.6STOCK CERTIFICATES.   Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company shall not be required to issue or deliver any certificates evidencing shares of Stock pursuant to the exercise of any Award, unless and until the Board has determined, with advice of counsel, that the issuance and delivery of such certificates is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of governmental authorities and, if applicable, the requirements of any exchange on which the shares of Stock are listed or traded. All Stock certificates delivered pursuant to the Plan are subject to any stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee deems necessary or advisable to comply with Federal, state, or foreign jurisdiction, securities or other laws, rules and regulations and the rules of any national securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Stock is listed, quoted, or traded. The Committee may place legends on any Stock certificate to reference restrictions applicable to the Stock. In addition to the terms and conditions provided herein, the Board may require that a Participant make such reasonable covenants, agreements, and representations as the Board, in its discretion, deems advisable in order to comply with any such laws, regulations, or requirements.

12.7ACCELERATION UPON A CHANGE OF CONTROL.   If a Change of Control occurs and Awards are converted, assumed, or replaced by a successor, the Committee shall have the discretion to cause all outstanding Awards to become fully exercisable and all restrictions on outstanding Awards to lapse. If a Change of Control occurs and Awards are not converted, assumed, or replaced by a successor, all outstanding Awards shall automatically become fully exercisable and all restrictions on outstanding Awards shall lapse. To the extent that this provision causes Incentive Stock Options to exceed the dollar limitation set forth in Section 7.2(d), the excess Options shall be deemed to be Non-Qualified Stock Options. Upon, or in anticipation of, such an event, the Committee may cause every Award outstanding hereunder to terminate at a specific time in the future and shall give each Participant the right to exercise Awards during a period of time as the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, shall determine.

ARTICLE 13
CHANGES IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE

13.1SHARES AVAILABLE FOR GRANT.   In the event of any change in the number of shares of Stock outstanding by reason of any stock dividend or split, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, combination or exchange of shares or similar corporate change, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock with respect to which the Committee may grant Awards, the number of shares of Stock subject to any Award, and any numeric limitation expressed in the Plan shall be appropriately adjusted by the Committee.

13.2OUTSTANDING AWARDS – INCREASE OR DECREASE IN ISSUED SHARES WITHOUT CONSIDERATION.   Subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, in the event of any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Stock resulting from a subdivision or consolidation of shares of Stock or the payment of a stock dividend (but only on the shares of Stock), or any other increase or decrease in the number of such shares effected without receipt or payment of consideration by the Company, the Committee shall proportionally adjust the number of shares of Stock subject to each outstanding Award and the exercise price per share of Stock of each such Award.

13.3OUTSTANDING AWARDS – CERTAIN MERGERS.   Subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, in the event that the Company shall be the surviving corporation in

12



any merger or consolidation (except a merger or consolidation as a result of which the holders of shares of Stock receive securities of another corporation), each Award outstanding on the date of such merger or consolidation shall pertain to and apply to the securities that a holder of the number of shares of Stock subject to such Award would have received in such merger or consolidation.

13.4OUTSTANDING AWARDS – OTHER CHANGES.   In the event of any other change in the capitalization of the Company or corporate change other than those specifically referred to in Article 13, the Committee may, in its absolute discretion, make such adjustments in the number and class of shares subject to Awards outstanding on the date on which such change occurs and in the per share exercise price of each Award as the Committee may consider appropriate to prevent the dilution or enlargement of rights relating to Awards granted under the Plan.

13.5NO OTHER RIGHTS.   Except as expressly provided in the Plan, no Participant shall have any rights by reason of any subdivision or consolidation of shares of stock of any class, the payment of any dividend, any increase or decrease in the number of shares of stock of any class or any dissolution, liquidation, merger, or consolidation of the Company or any other corporation. Except as expressly provided in the Plan, no issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number of shares of Stock subject to an Award or the exercise price of any Award.

ARTICLE 14
AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION, AND TERMINATION

14.1AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION, AND TERMINATION.   With the approval of the Board, at any time and from time to time, the Committee may terminate, amend or modify the Plan; provided, however, that (i) to the extent necessary and desirable to comply with any applicable law, regulation, or stock exchange rule, the Company shall obtain stockholder approval of any Plan amendment in such a manner and to such a degree as required, (ii) shareholder approval is required for any amendment to the Plan that (A) increases the number of shares available under the Plan (other than any adjustment as provided by Article 13), (B) permits the Committee to grant Options with an exercise price that is below Fair Market Value on the date of grant, (C) permits the Committee to extend the exercise period for an Option beyond ten years from the date of grant, or (D) permits the Committee to reprice previously granted Options, and (iii) no such action shall be taken that would cause all or part of the payment under any Award to be subject to the additional tax under Section 409A of the Code.

14.2AWARDS PREVIOUSLY GRANTED.   No termination, amendment, or modification of the Plan shall adversely affect in any material way any Award previously granted pursuant to the Plan without the prior written consent of the Participant.

ARTICLE 15
GENERAL PROVISIONS

15.1NO RIGHTS TO AWARDS.   No Participant, employee, or other person shall have any claim to be granted any Award pursuant to the Plan, and neither the Company nor the Committee is obligated to treat Participants, employees, and other persons uniformly.

15.2NO STOCKHOLDERS RIGHTS.   No Award gives the Participant any of the rights of a stockholder of the Company unless and until shares of Stock are in fact issued to such person in connection with such Award.

13



15.3WITHHOLDING.   The Company or any Subsidiary shall have the authority and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy Federal, state, and local taxes (including the Participant’s FICA obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to any taxable event concerning a Participant arising as a result of this Plan. With the Committee’s consent, a Participant may elect to (i) have the Company withhold from those shares of Stock that would otherwise be received upon the exercise of any Option, a number of shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum statutory amount necessary to satisfy the Company’s applicable federal, state, local or foreign income and employment tax withholding obligations with respect to such Participant, or (ii) tender previously-owned shares of Stock held by the Participant for six months or longer to satisfy the Company’s applicable federal, state, local, or foreign income and employment tax withholding obligations with respect to the Participant.

15.4NO RIGHT TO EMPLOYMENT OR SERVICES.   Nothing in the Plan or any Award Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate any Participant’s employment or services at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ or service of the Company or any Subsidiary.

15.5UNFUNDED STATUS OF AWARDS.   The Plan is intended to be an “unfunded” plan for incentive compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Award Agreement shall give the Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company or any Subsidiary.

15.6INDEMNIFICATION.   To the extent allowable pursuant to applicable law, each member of the Committee or of the Board shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company from any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by such member in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action or failure to act pursuant to the Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by him or her in satisfaction of judgment in such action, suit, or proceeding against him or her provided he or she gives the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled pursuant to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

15.7RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER BENEFITS.   No payment pursuant to the Plan shall be taken into account in determining any benefits pursuant to any pension, retirement, savings, profit sharing, group insurance, welfare or other benefit plan of the Company or any Subsidiary.

15.8EXPENSES.   The expenses of administering the Plan shall be borne by the Company and its Subsidiaries.

15.9TITLES AND HEADINGS.   The titles and headings of the Sections in the Plan are for convenience of reference only and, in the event of any conflict, the text of the Plan, rather than such titles or headings, shall control.

15.10FRACTIONAL SHARES.   No fractional shares of Stock shall be issued and the Committee shall determine, in its discretion, whether cash shall be given in lieu of fractional shares or whether such fractional shares shall be eliminated by rounding up or down as appropriate.

14



15.11SECURITIES LAW COMPLIANCE.   With respect to any person who is, on the relevant date, obligated to file reports pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, transactions pursuant to this Plan are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors pursuant to the Exchange Act. To the extent any provision of the Plan or action by the Committee fails to so comply, it shall be void to the extent permitted by law and voidable as deemed advisable by the Committee.

15.12GOVERNMENT AND OTHER REGULATIONS.   The obligation of the Company to make payment of awards in Stock or otherwise shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by government agencies as may be required. The Company shall be under no obligation to register pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, any of the shares of Stock paid pursuant to the Plan. If the shares paid pursuant to the Plan may in certain circumstances be exempt from registration pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Company may restrict the transfer of such shares in such manner as it deems advisable to ensure the availability of any such exemption.

15.13GOVERNING LAW.   The Plan and all Award Agreements shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Maryland.

15.14SECTION 409A.   If any payments under this Plan are subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, it is intended that the terms of this Plan will comply fully with and meet all the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

15



Appendix C

MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION

2006 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

ARTICLE 1.
ESTABLISHMENT, AND PURPOSE, AND DURATION

1.1Establishment of the Plan. Meritage Homes Corporation (the “Company”), hereby establishes an annual incentive plan to be known as the “Meritage Homes Corporation 2006 Executive Management Incentive Plan” (the “Plan”).

1.2Purpose of the Plan. The Plan is designed to (i) recognize and reward on an annual basis select Company executives for their contributions to the overall success of the Company, and (ii) qualify compensation paid under the Plan as “performance-based compensation” as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) and the regulations thereunder.

1.3Duration of the Plan. Subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders, the Plan will commence as of February 15, 2006. If the Plan is not approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Plan will not be effective and any grants made under the Plan prior to that date will be void. The Plan shall terminate on February 14, 2011. No award may be made under the Plan after the date the Plan terminates, but awards made prior to that date may extend beyond that date.

ARTICLE 2.
DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION

2.1Definitions. Whenever used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below and, when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word is capitalized:

(a)                                  “Award” means the agreement of the Company to pay compensation to a Participant upon the attainment of specified Performance Goals.

(b)                                 “Award Agreement” means the written agreement evidencing the terms and conditions of an Award.

(c)                                  “Board” or “Board or Directors” means the Board of Directors of Meritage Homes Corporation.

(d)                                 “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

(e)                                  “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or the committee appointed by the Board pursuant to Article 3 to administer the Plan.

(f)                                    “Company” means Meritage Homes Corporation, or any successor thereto.

(g)                                 “Covered Employee” means an Employee who is a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.

(h)                                 “Director” means any individual who is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.



(i)                                     “Employee” means any full-time, nonunion employee of the Company. Directors who are not otherwise employed by the Company shall not be considered Employees under this Plan.

(j)                                     “Participant” means a Covered Employee who is designated by the Committee to participate in the Plan for a Performance Period pursuant to Article 4.

(k)                                  “Performance Criteria” means the criteria that the Committee selects for purposes of establishing the Performance Goal or Performance Goals for a Participant for a Performance Period. The Performance Criteria that will be used to establish Performance Goals are limited to the following:  pre- or after-tax net earnings, earnings before interest expense (including interest amortized to cost of sales) and income taxes (“EBIT”), earnings before interest expense (including interest amortized to cost of sales), income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), revenue growth, operating income, operating cash flow, return on net assets, return on shareholders’ equity, return on assets, return on capital, Share price growth, shareholder returns, gross or net profit margin, earnings per Share, price per Share, and market share, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms, or as compared to any incremental increase, or as compared to results of a peer group. The Committee may provide that the Performance Criteria may include or exclude extraordinary charges, non-recurring or unusual items, accounting charges or similar items  The Committee shall, within the time prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code, define in an objective fashion the manner of calculating the Performance Criteria it selects to use for such Performance Period for such Participant.

(l)                                     “Performance Goals” means, for a Performance Period, the goals established in writing by the Committee for the Performance Period based upon the Performance Criteria. Depending on the Performance Criteria used to establish such Goal, the Goal may be expressed in terms of overall Company performance or the performance of an operating unit, division, or community. The Committee, in its discretion, may, within the time prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code, adjust or modify the calculation of Performance Goals for such Performance Period in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants, (i) in the event of, or in anticipation of, any unusual or extraordinary corporate item, transaction, event, or development; and (ii) in recognition of, or in anticipation of, any other unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company, or the financial statements of the Company, or in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, or business conditions.

(m)                               “Performance Period” means the one or more periods of time, which may be of varying and overlapping durations, as the Committee may select, over which the attainment of one or more Performance Goals will be measured for the purpose of determining a Participant’s right to, and the payment of, compensation under the Plan.

(n)                                 “Shares” means the shares of common stock of Meritage Homes Corporation.

2.2Severability. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines that any portion of this Plan is in violation of any statute, common law, or public policy, then only the portions of this Plan that violate such statute, common law, or public policy shall be stricken. All portions of this Plan that do not violate any statute or public policy shall continue in full force and effect. Further, any court order striking any portion of this Plan shall modify the stricken terms as narrowly as possible to give as much effect as possible to the intentions of the parties under this Plan.

2



ARTICLE 3.
ADMINISTRATION

3.1The Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, or by any other Committee appointed by the Board consisting of not less than two Directors who qualify as “outside directors” under Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations issued thereunder. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by, and shall serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors.

3.2Authority of the Committee. The Committee shall have all the authority that is necessary or helpful to enable it to discharge its responsibilities under the Plan. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, the Committee shall have the exclusive right to interpret the Plan, to determine eligibility for participation in the Plan, to decide all questions concerning eligibility for and the amount of Awards payable under the Plan, to establish and administer the Performance Goals and certify whether, and to what extent, they are attained, to cancel and reissue any Awards granted hereunder in the event the Award lapses for any reason (provided that the Committee shall not have the authority to re-price previously issued and currently outstanding Awards without shareholder approval), to construe any ambiguous provisions of the Plan, to correct any default, to supply any omission, to reconcile any inconsistency, to issue administrative guidelines as an aide to the administration of the Plan, to make regulations for carrying out the Plan, and to decide any and all questions arising in the administration, interpretation, and application of the Plan.

3.3Decisions Binding. All determinations and decisions made by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and all related orders or resolutions of the Board of Directors shall be final, conclusive, and binding on all persons, including the Company, its stockholders, Employees, Participants, and their estates and beneficiaries.

3.4Section 162(m) Compliance. This Plan shall be administered to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code and, if any provisions of the Plan cause any Award to not qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, that provision shall be stricken from this Plan, but the other provisions of this Plan shall remain in effect. Any action striking any portion of this Plan shall modify the stricken terms as narrowly as possible to give as much effect as possible to the intentions of the parties under this Plan. Furthermore, if any portion of the Plan or any Award Agreement conflicts with Section 162(m) or the regulations issued thereunder, the provisions of Section 162(m) and such regulations shall control.

ARTICLE 4.
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION

4.1Eligibility. Participation is limited in any fiscal year to Employees who the Committee concludes will be Covered Employees for such year.

4.2Actual Participation. From among the Covered Employees eligible to participate each year, the Committee may select those to receive Awards in any one or more Performance Periods under the Plan.

3



ARTICLE 5.
FORM OF AWARDS.

Awards shall be paid in cash. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, subject any Award to such terms, conditions, restrictions, or limitations (including but not limited to restrictions on transferability, vesting, termination of employment for cause or otherwise, or change of control) that the Committee deems to be appropriate, provided that such terms are not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan or Section 162(m) of the Code. All Awards will be evidenced by an Award Agreement.

ARTICLE 6.
DETERMINATION AND LIMITATION OF AWARDS.

6.1Determination of Awards. Within the time prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code for each Performance Period, the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine and establish:

(a)                                  the Performance Goals applicable to the Performance Period for each Participant;

(b)                                 the total dollar amount (or formula pursuant to which the total dollar amount is determined) payable to each Participant under the Award based upon attaining the Performance Goals; and

(c)                                  such other terms and conditions of such Award as the Committee determines to be appropriate under the circumstances.

Such determinations shall be reflected in the minutes of a Committee meeting, or in a written action adopted without the necessity of a meeting, and also shall be documented in the Award Agreement.

6.2Limitations of Awards. If only one Performance Goal is established for a Performance Period, the Performance Goal for such Performance Period must be achieved in order for a Participant to receive payment for an Award for such Performance Period. If more than one Performance Goal is established for a Performance Period, one or more of the Performance Goals for such Performance Period must be achieved in order for a Participant to receive payment for an Award for such Performance Period, all as set forth in accordance with the terms of the Award Agreement. Furthermore, the Committee is authorized at any time during or after a Performance Period to reduce or eliminate (but not to increase) the amount of an Award payable to any Covered Employee for a Performance Period for any reason.

6.3Maximum Awards. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, the maximum Award payable to any Covered Employee under the Plan for a Performance Period shall be 1.85% of EBITDA, before consideration of bonuses paid to Covered Employees.

6.4Employment Continuation. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, provided in the Award Agreement, or required by applicable law, no payment pursuant to this Plan shall be made to a Participant unless the Participant is employed by the Company on the last day of the Performance Period.

6.5Payment of Awards. The Awards under this Plan shall be paid to each Participant no later than the 15th day of the third month following the calendar year in which the Award is earned, or, if payment by such date is not “administratively practicable” (as determined by the regulations issued under Section 409A of the Code), such later date as permitted by the regulations issued under Section 409A of the Code.

4



ARTICLE 7.
RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES

7.1Employment. Nothing in the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate any Participant’s employment at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ of the Company.

7.2Participation. No Employee shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award.

ARTICLE 8.
AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION, AND TERMINATION

The Committee may suspend or terminate the Plan at any time with or without prior notice. In addition, the Committee may from time to time and with or without prior notice, amend or modify the Plan in any manner, but may not without shareholder approval adopt any amendment that would require the vote of shareholders of the Company pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code.

ARTICLE 9.
WITHHOLDING

The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy Federal, state, and local taxes (including the Participant’s FICA obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to any grant, exercise, or payment made under or as a result of this Plan.

ARTICLE 10.
SUCCESSORS

All obligations of the Company under the Plan, with respect to Awards granted hereunder, shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

ARTICLE 11.
REQUIREMENTS OF LAW

11.1Requirements of Law. The granting of Awards under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies as may be required.

11.2Governing Law. The Plan, and all agreements hereunder, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Maryland.

11.3Section 409A of the Code. If any payments under this Plan are subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, it is intended that the Plan will comply fully with and meet all the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

5



– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - MAY 17, 2006

 

 

Larry W. Seay

 

Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Secretary

April 11, 2005

26



MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATIONThis proxy is solicited on behalf of the Meritage Homes Corporation Board of Directors.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - May 11, 2005

The undersigned hereby appoints each of Steven J. Hilton or John R. Landon as proxies with full power of substitution acting unanimously and voting or if only one is present and voting then that one, to vote the shares of stock of Meritage Homes Corporation, which the undersigned is entitled to vote, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the The Fairmont Scottsdale Princess, 7575 E. Princess Drive, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255Hotel Crescent Court, 400 Crescent Court, Dallas, Texas 75201 on Wednesday May 11, 200517, 2006 at 9:10:00 a.ma.m. local time, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, with all the powers the undersigned would possess if present.

 

IF YOU RETURN YOUR PROPERLY EXECUTED PROXY, WE WILL VOTE YOUR SHARES AS YOU DIRECT. IF YOU DO NOT SPECIFY ON YOUR PROXY CARD HOW YOU WANT TO VOTE YOUR SHARES, WE WILL VOTE THEM FOR THE ELECTION OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM IN PROPOSALPROPOSALS 2 THRU 5, AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE APPOINTED PROXIES ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF.

 

Please mark, sign and date the reverse side and

return the proxy card promptly using the enclosed envelope.

(Continued on reverse side)

Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)

/\ FOLD AND DETACH HERE /\



Please
Mark Here
for Address
Change or
Comments

o

SEE REVERSE SIDE

WITHHELD

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS:

FOR

FOR ALL

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

VOTE FOR nominees listed below

o

o

2.

To ratify the Company’s

o

o

o

independent registered public

01 John R. Landon

accounting firm.

02 Robert G. Sarver

03 Peter L. Ax

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS YOU SPECIFY ABOVE. IF NO SPECIFIC VOTING DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN BY YOU, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTED AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM IN PROPOSAL 2, AND WITH RESPECT TO SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISCRETION OF THE APPOINTED PROXY. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY.

04 C. Timothy White

05 Gerald W. Haddock

06 Richard T. Burke, Sr.

WITHHELD FOR: (Write that nominee’s name in the space

provided below.)

 

 

 

(Continued on reverse side)

 

 

 

 



RETURN ADDRESS

&

VOTE BY MAIL

LOGO

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope  we have provided or return it to Meritage Homes Corporation, c/o ADP, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

MAILING

ADDRESS

“DO NOT PLACE ANY TEXT BELOW MAILING ADDRESS”

SUMMARY PROCESSING

CONTROL #

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

MERIT1

KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

SignatureTHIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 MERITAGE HOMES CORPORATION

 

Signature

Date

 

 

 

 

 

Vote on Directors

For

Withhold

For All

To withhold authority to

1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS:

All

All

Except

vote for any individual nominee,

VOTE FOR nominees listed below

mark “For All Except” and write

o

o

o

the nominee’s name on the line

01

Steven J. Hilton

below.

02

Raymond Oppel

 

 

03

William G. Campbell

04

Richard T. Burke, Sr.

Vote on Proposals

For

Against

Abstain

2.

To approve the increase of the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock from 50 million shares to 125 million shares.

o

o

o

3.

To approve the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.

o

o

o

4.

To approve the 2006 Annual Incentive Plan.

o

o

o

5.

To ratify the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

o

o

o

Please sign exactly as name(s) appear herein.  If acting as an executor, administrator, trustee, custodian, guardian, etc., you should so indicate in signing.  If the stockholderstockholders is a corporation, please sign the full corporate name, by a duly authorized officer.  If shares are held jointly, each stockholder named should sign.

/\FOLD AND DETACH HERE /\

Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail

24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week

Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time

the day prior to annual meeting day.

Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner

as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.

 

InternetYes

Telephone

Mail

http://www.proxyvoting.com/mth

1-866-540-5760No

 

Mark, sign and date

Use the internet to vote your proxy.

 

Use any touch-tone telephone to

your proxy card and

Have your proxy card in hand when

OR

vote your proxy.  Have your proxy

OR

return it in the

you access the web site.

card in hand when you call.

enclosed postage-paid

 

 

 

 

envelope.

If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,
you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.

HOUSEHOLDING ELECTION - Please indicate if you consent to receive certain future investor  communications in a single package per household.

o

o

Signature (PLEASE SIGN WITH IN BOX)

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date